- 14 February 2025. 1. Issue notice, returnable on 04.04.2025. 2. The alleged contemnor shall remain present in-person, on the next date of hearing.
- 4 April 2025. The alleged contemnor(s)/respondent(s)-Geeta, has not been served in spite of efforts of the petitioner. We direct that the Station House Officer (SHO), Mayur Vihar serve the copy of the petition to the said alleged contemnor(s)/respondent.
- 25 July 2025. Perused the letter/Service Report dated 15.05.2025 received from the Station House Officer, Mayur Vihar, Delhi, which indicates that the alleged contemnor – Geeta has been duly served with a copy of the petition. But no one has entered appearance on her behalf even after service of notice. Under these circumstances, we
- 1 September 2025. 1. Pursuant to our order dated 25.07.2025, alleged contemnor respondent is present in person. 2. We request Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee to appear for the alleged contemnor. Supreme Court Legal Services Committee is directed to co-ordinate and provide all assistance to the learned counsel, who has gracefully accepted ou
- 19 September 2025. 1. Application for impleadment being IA (D) No. 205360 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. This Court by order dated 05.12.2023 allowed the appeal filed by the petitioners and directed the contemnor to retain possession till 31.12.2024, subject to filing of the usual undertaking within four weeks of passing the order
- 13 October 2025. 1. The Contempt Petition is closed in terms of the Signed Order. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Mr. Aneesh Mittal, Ms. Aakriti Goel, Ms. Surabhi Tuli, Ms. Kamana Divya Sree, Ms. Kriti Jain Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr. Danish Saifi, Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Mr. Preeti Kumari, Mr. Rahul Yadav, Mr. Thamizhendhi, Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Ayush Sharma, Mr. Rashid N. Azam
