- 30 January 2026. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, list on the matter on 20.02.2026.
- 20 February 2026. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Heard Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
- 1 April 2026. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed spare copy for service on the sole respondent alongwith an application seeking condonation of delay in filing spare copy. Application is hereby allowed. Consequently, delay is condoned. Issue notice immediately. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court
- 20 April 2026. 1. Having heard Mr. A.Venayagam Balan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Apoorv Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to enlarge the appellant on bail pending consideration of the appeal by this Court. T
- 30 April 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Time has been sought to file reply. As per office report, scanned soft copies of original records from the High Court as well as Trial Court have been received and copy of the same has already been provided to Ld.counsels for the parties.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, Mrs. Santhanalakshmi, Mr. Muthuvel Palani, Mr. Puneet Thakur, Mr. Ananthu R.s Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Apoorv Shukla, Ms. Prabhleen Shukla, Ms. Ilashri Gaur, Mr. Prabhleen A. Shukla
