M/S UNITED SPIRITS LTD. Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR PAKSHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND ANR. [CAVEAT] (C.A. 211/2020)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 211/2020

Case Record

C.A. 211/2020

M/S UNITED SPIRITS LTD. Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR PAKSHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND ANR. [CAVEAT]

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

10 PDF renditions· 10 distinct judicial orders· 10 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S UNITED SPIRITS LTD. Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR PAKSHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.. C.A. 211/2020 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010355462019. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 10 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 October 2019 to 24 March 2026.

On 4 October 2019 the order records: Application for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment is allowed. Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed.
On 2 December 2019 the order records: In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the respondents, two weeks' time is given to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit be filed within two weeks thereafter.
On 6 January 2020 the order records: As usual the respondents being public authority do not consider it necessary to file pleadings in time! Despite opportunities, counder affidavit has not been filed.
On 5 August 2022 the order records: 1. Having heard learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant, learned counsel appearing for the respondents and on carefully perusing the material available on record, we find no merit in the interlocutory application filed by the respondents seeking early hearing of the civil appeals. 2. The Interlocutory Applic
On 20 August 2024 the order records: List for hearing on 20th November, 2024. Both the parties are permitted to file written submissions, not exceeding three pages.
On 27 November 2024 the order records: List IA No. 128556 of 2024 on 9th December, 2024. In the meanwhile, the respondents will file a counter affidavit to the application.
On 9 December 2024 the order records: IA No. 128556/2024 (APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) AND IA No. 128557/2024 (EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
On 24 March 2026 the order records: IA No. 170070/2025 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 October 2019. Application for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment is allowed. Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed.
2 December 2019. In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the respondents, two weeks' time is given to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit be filed within two weeks thereafter.
6 January 2020. As usual the respondents being public authority do not consider it necessary to file pleadings in time! Despite opportunities, counder affidavit has not been filed.
5 August 2022. 1. Having heard learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant, learned counsel appearing for the respondents and on carefully perusing the material available on record, we find no merit in the interlocutory application filed by the respondents seeking early hearing of the civil appeals. 2. The Interlocutory Applic
2 August 2024. List on 20th August, 2024.
20 August 2024. List for hearing on 20th November, 2024. Both the parties are permitted to file written submissions, not exceeding three pages.
20 November 2024. List on 27th November, 2024. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS
27 November 2024. List IA No. 128556 of 2024 on 9th December, 2024. In the meanwhile, the respondents will file a counter affidavit to the application.
9 December 2024. IA No. 128556/2024 (APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) AND IA No. 128557/2024 (EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
24 March 2026. IA No. 170070/2025 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Mr. Niraj Gupta, Ms. Anshu Gupta, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr. Parag P.Tripathi, Mr. Abhinav Tandon, Mrs. Anshu Gupta, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jain, Mr. Rakesh, Mr. Shubham Gupta, Ms. Siddhi Gupta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Misra, Mr. Manoj Kr. Sharma, Mr. Suraj Singh, Mr. Manoj Sharma, Mr Daleep Dhyani, Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Ms. Indu Misra, Mrs. Disha Jham

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 March 2026 the latest order on this record says: IA No. 170070/2025 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 24 Mar 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Mar 2026

Next hearing

16 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 10 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.