M/S SHALIMAR GRANITE Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER C. K. SASI [R-1] (C.A. 15138/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 15138/2017

Case Record

C.A. 15138/2017

M/S SHALIMAR GRANITE Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER C. K. SASI [R-1]

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI · HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Land Property

9 PDF renditions· 9 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S SHALIMAR GRANITE Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER. C.A. 15138/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010252242017. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 8 September 2017 to 22 August 2026.

On 8 September 2017 the order records: Leave granted. There shall be interim stay of the collection of tax in disputed on the condition that the appellant gives an immovable property security for the amount of tax to the satisfaction of the Commercial Tax Officer, Pattambi.
On 14 December 2017 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Parties may file the Statements of Case within the stipulated time.
On 25 January 2018 the order records: Leave granted. There shall be interim stay of the collection of tax in dispute on the condition that the appellant gives an immovable property security for the amount of tax to the satisfaction of the Commercial Tax Officer, Chittur.
On 20 February 2018 the order records: In Civil Appeal No. 15138 of 2017 Learned counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks' time, as a last opportunity, to file affidavit of valuation. Mr. C.K. Sasi, Advocate-on-Record appears on behalf of the sole respondent seeks and is given four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
On 6 April 2018 the order records: Respondents are duly represented. Statement of case may be filed within the stipulated period.
On 24 April 2018 the order records: When the matters were called, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants. Despite two last opportunities having been given, no affidavit of valuation and statement of case have been filed by the learned counsel for the appellants so far.
On 4 September 2018 the order records: Respondents in both matters are duly represented. Statement of case has been filed by the appellant in both matters.
On 22 August 2026 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the appellants states that during the pendency of these proceedings, the benefit of the amnesty scheme has been availed and as such the instant appeals have rendered infructuous. 2. As prayed for, the appeals are dismissed as having become infructuous.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

8 September 2017. Leave granted. There shall be interim stay of the collection of tax in disputed on the condition that the appellant gives an immovable property security for the amount of tax to the satisfaction of the Commercial Tax Officer, Pattambi.
14 December 2017. Sole respondent is duly represented. Parties may file the Statements of Case within the stipulated time.
12 January 2018. Affidavit of valuation be filed within four weeks time. List again on 20.2.2018.
25 January 2018. Leave granted. There shall be interim stay of the collection of tax in dispute on the condition that the appellant gives an immovable property security for the amount of tax to the satisfaction of the Commercial Tax Officer, Chittur.
20 February 2018. In Civil Appeal No. 15138 of 2017 Learned counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks' time, as a last opportunity, to file affidavit of valuation. Mr. C.K. Sasi, Advocate-on-Record appears on behalf of the sole respondent seeks and is given four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
6 April 2018. Respondents are duly represented. Statement of case may be filed within the stipulated period.
24 April 2018. When the matters were called, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants. Despite two last opportunities having been given, no affidavit of valuation and statement of case have been filed by the learned counsel for the appellants so far.
4 September 2018. Respondents in both matters are duly represented. Statement of case has been filed by the appellant in both matters.
22 August 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the appellants states that during the pendency of these proceedings, the benefit of the amnesty scheme has been availed and as such the instant appeals have rendered infructuous. 2. As prayed for, the appeals are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Ranjith B. Marar, Ms. Lakshmi N. Kaimal, Ms. Vasudha Gupta, Mr Renjith, Mr. Renjith B. Marar, Mr. Anubhav Anand Pandey, Mr. Vishnu, Mr. Krishnadas Villadath, Mr Anubhav Pandey, Ms Parul Dhurvey, Mr. Arun Poomulli Advocates — Respondents: Mr. C.K. Sasi, Mr. C. K. Sasi, Ms Nayantara Roy, Mr. James P. Thomas, Mr. Ravi Sagar, Ms. Glorina George

Relief Sought & Granted

On 22 August 2026 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellants states that during the pendency of these proceedings, the benefit of the amnesty scheme has been availed and as such the instant appeals have rendered infructuous. 2. As prayed for, the appeals are dismissed as having become infructuous.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Land Property

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 22 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 22 Aug 2026

Final disposition

Learned counsel for the appellants states that during the pendency of these proceedings, the benefit of the amnesty scheme has been availed and as such the instant appeals have rendered infructuous. 2. As prayed for, the appeals are dismissed as having become infructuous.

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.