- 20 September 2024. 1. Delay condoned. Issue notice. 2. Mr. T. Sundar Ramanathan, AOR accepts notice on Caveat on behalf of respondents.
- 10 December 2024. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent nos.2 to 5. Dasti in addition is allowed, as prayed. Affidavit of dasti service be filed within four weeks.
- 20 March 2025. Respondent no.1 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time as last opportunity to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent nos.2 to 5.
- 5 May 2025. Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit. As per office report, Ld.Counsel for the appellant has failed to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars, despite the grant of last opportunity, for service on respondent Nos.2 to 5. Today, it has been submitted by th
- 31 July 2025. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent nos. 2 to 5.
- 10 September 2025. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. Respondent no. 1 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is hereby declined. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed affidavit of dasti service with regard to respondent nos. 2 to 5 despite last opportunity
- 30 October 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that yesterday evening, an application has been filed to take out substituted service against respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Registry to verify. 2. Paper publication to be completed as against respondent Nos.2 to 5 in “Indian Express”(English) and “Dina Thanthi”(Tamil) Chennai edi
- 22 July 2026. As per office report dated 20.07.2026, service is complete on Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Registry to process the matter as per Rules.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. V. Giri, Mr. T. Harish Kumar, Mr. Navneet Dugar, Mr. Harshed Sundar, Mr. Nihar Dharmadhikari, Mr. Subham Kothari, Mr. Bharathi Subramaniayan, Mr. Bharathi Subramanian, Mr Subham Chopra, Mr. Shubham P.Chopra, Mr. Shubham Kothari, Ms Aiyushi Daga Advocates — Respondents: Mr. P.V.S. Giridhar, Mr. T. Sundar Ramanathan, Mr. Vivek Pandey, Mr. Krishan Singhal, Mr Krishan Singhal, Ms. Aastha Sardana, Ms. Anshika Singh
