- 2 September 2011. Nobody is present. By way of last opportunity, two weeks' time is granted to file the statement of case.
- 26 April 2013. A perusal of the record indicates that an application for discharge of the Advocate for the respondent - Corporation has been moved on record. However, it does not clear as to for which respondents, the said application has been moved.
- 9 May 2013. Respondent No.1 is duly served at the Special Leave Petition stage but none appeared on his behalf. On behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3, I.A. No.4 has been moved on record seeking discharge of the learned Advocate, Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta alongwith vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on their behalf by the learned Advocat
- 15 July 2013. By invoking powers under Order VI Rule 17 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966, application for discharge filed by the ld. Counsel in respect of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 stands allowed. Respondent No.1 is reported to be duly served but no one has entered appeared on his behalf.
- 21 August 2015. This is an application for vacation of stay granted on 06.11.2009. Having regard to the facts of the case we are of the view that Civil Appeal itself needs to be heard expeditiously.
- 17 November 2015. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the parties that the talks of settlement are going on, put up this case after four weeks. [INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR]
- 14 January 2016. It is stated that the matter has been settled between the parties. List after four weeks.
- 29 January 2016. By order dated 14.01.2016, this Court passed the following order in this appeal : "It is stated that the matter has been set tled between the parties.
- 18 February 2016. Not to be taken up today.
- 5 May 2016. The matter be listed before a Bench of which one of us (R. K. Agrawal, J.) is not a member.
- 27 July 2016. List next week.
- 29 September 2016. As prayed, the matter is adjourned for two weeks. (SONALI SAUND) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) SR.P.A
- 9 November 2016. As prayed for, not to be heard today and tomorrow. [MALA KUMARI SHARMA] [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR]
- 16 November 2016. At request, the appeal stands adjourned by three weeks.
- 17 January 2017. It is submitted that there is a possibility of amicable settlement. The new Managing Director of the U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Limited is directed to consider about the amicable settlement, if any. The appellant shall submit a representation to the Managing Director.
- 24 January 2017. It is stated by learned senior counsel for the appellant that as talks with respect to amicable settlement are going on, matter may be adjourned by four weeks so as to finalise the settlement between the parties. As prayed for, list after four weeks.
- 29 March 2017. List in the week commencing on 18 th April, 2017.
- 27 April 2017. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 4 September 2019. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed.
- 26 July 2021. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. This application has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3 for early hearing of the appeal.
- 26 April 2022. At request, matter is adjourned. List after ensuing summer vacation.
- 11 October 2022. List the main appeal on 13.10.2022. IA No.135900/2022 for early hearing is allowed accordingly.
- 13 October 2022. List the matter in the second week of November, 2022. (PRADEEP KUMAR) (KAMLESH RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- 7 November 2022. List in the second week of December, 2022 for hearing on a Non Miscellaneous Day.
- 22 February 2023. List the matter next week.
- 6 April 2023. List the matter on 19.04.2023.
- 10 January 2024. List the appeal on 07.02.2024.
- 15 February 2024. On the request made on behalf of the appellant, list the matter on 21.02.2024.
- 29 February 2024. On the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, list the matters on 6th March, 2024.
- 6 March 2024. Mr. Tarun Gulati, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, makes the following submissions : (1) That the total outstanding dues as communicated by the Regional Manager of Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (for short, “UPSIDA”) was Rs.10,95,52,825/-, which amount the appellant is ready and
- The record also contains 15 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Awanish Sinha, Mr. Nilotpal Sharma, Mr. Pratyush K. Yadav, Mr Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Mr. K.K.Venugopal, Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Mr. K. K. Venugopal, Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Reena Singh, Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. R.P.Mehrotra, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Mr. Abhinav Malik, Ms. Charu Ambwani, Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Mr. Vibhu Tiwari, Mr. G. Sankaranarayanan, Mr. Zeeshan Diwan, Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, Mr. Ankit Agarwal
