M/S PANAMA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE III LIMITED Versus M/S NUTAN KALPANA CO-OP. HSG. SOC. LTD (C.A. 3406/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3406/2025

Case Record

C.A. 3406/2025

M/S PANAMA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE III LIMITED Versus M/S NUTAN KALPANA CO-OP. HSG. SOC. LTD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Taxation

10 PDF renditions· 10 distinct judicial orders· 10 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S PANAMA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Versus M/S NUTAN KALPANA CO-OP. HSG. SOC. LTD. C.A. 3406/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010296932023. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 10 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 6 October 2023 to 27 April 2026.

On 6 October 2023 the order records: Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief.
On 2 September 2025 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. The matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
On 27 April 2026 the order records: 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to pass any order on the application for stay at this stage. 2. We are of the opinion that this is a fit case to refer the dispute to mediation for resolution of the disputes between the parties.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

6 October 2023. Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief.
22 August 2024. List on 13.09.2024.
13 September 2024. List on 20.09.2024.
20 September 2024. Post after three weeks.
2 December 2024. Post in the month of February, 2025 on a non-miscellaneous day.
18 February 2025. The matter stands adjourned to 25.02.2025. (INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS
25 February 2025. Leave granted. Hearing expedited.
2 September 2025. Sole respondent is duly represented. The matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
7 April 2026. List the application on 27.04.2026.
27 April 2026. 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to pass any order on the application for stay at this stage. 2. We are of the opinion that this is a fit case to refer the dispute to mediation for resolution of the disputes between the parties.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Sheena Taqui, Ms. Gulnar Mistry, Ms. Akansha Saini, Mr. Rihal, Mrs. Bina Gupta, Mr. Shiv Vinayak Gupta, Mr. Rihal Kazi, Mr. Guru Shanmugam, Mr. C.U. Singh, Mr. S.H. Merchant, Ms. Zainab Tinwala, Ms. Akansha Siani Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Mr. Rajbir Bansal, Mr. Arun Kumar Nagar, Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Mr. Roop Chaudhary, Ms. Savita, Mr. Hemraj Tewatia, Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Ms. Rajshree Singh, Mr. Yash Tyagi, Mr. Rahul Kasana

Relief Sought & Granted

On 27 April 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to pass any order on the application for stay at this stage. 2. We are of the opinion that this is a fit case to refer the dispute to mediation for resolution of the disputes between the parties.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 27 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 27 Apr 2026

Next hearing

27 Apr 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 10 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.