M/S JVK INFRA Versus MOHD. MUBEEN AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY [R-2] (C.A. 4000/2014)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 4000/2014

Case Record

C.A. 4000/2014

M/S JVK INFRA Versus MOHD. MUBEEN AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY [R-2]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

32 PDF renditions· 32 distinct judicial orders· 23 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S JVK INFRA Versus MOHD. MUBEEN & ORS.. C.A. 4000/2014 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010075632014. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 23 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 22 September 2014 to 20 May 2026.

On 22 September 2014 the order records: Learned senior counsel for the appellant strongly relies on the averments made by the appellant before the National Green Tribunal which were expressly noticed in paragraph 20 of the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2 (the appellant herein). Issue notice.
On 4 August 2015 the order records: The respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. The office report indicates that although by order da ted 15.04.2015 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file the affidavit in proof of dasti serv
On 29 January 2016 the order records: The respondent No.4 has already filed the counter affidavit. The Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within Date: 2016.01.30 12:15:33 TLT Reason: the period stipulated under the rules.
On 24 February 2025 the order records: Service is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 4.1 to 4.8 & 4.10 but none has entered appearance. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are represented by the Ld.
On 16 April 2025 the order records: It has been submitted by Ld. counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 that time be granted to file vakalatnama. Let the same be filed as per rules. As per office report, Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed only fresh particulars for service on respondent No.4.9 but has not filed spare copy, despite the grant of last oppo
On 6 November 2025 the order records: Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are duly represented. Time has been sought to file counter affidavit. Let the same be filed within four weeks. Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed spare copy for service on respondent No.4.9 and an application seeking condonation of delay in filing fresh particulars alongwith a letter of fres
On 9 December 2025 the order records: Respondent nos. 2 and 3 are duly represented. Ld. counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars for service on respondent no.4.9 by 16.12.2025. However, it has been submitted by the ld. counsel for the appellant that permission be granted to serve the said respondent through paper publication
On 20 May 2026 the order records: 1. Interlocutory Application No.11111/2026 seeking deletion of respondent No.4.9 is allowed at the risk of the appellant. 2. Name of such respondent be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellant.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

22 September 2014. Learned senior counsel for the appellant strongly relies on the averments made by the appellant before the National Green Tribunal which were expressly noticed in paragraph 20 of the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2 (the appellant herein). Issue notice.
21 November 2014. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to all the unserved respondents. List again on 5.02.2015.
15 April 2015. The Learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 seek and are given four weeks' time as last chance to file the counter affidavit. The learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of three weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 1 and 4 whereaf te
4 August 2015. The respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. The office report indicates that although by order da ted 15.04.2015 of this Court, three weeks time as last chance was given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to file the affidavit in proof of dasti serv
23 September 2015. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is allowed further three weeks' time to file affidavit of Dasti service of notice on respondent No. 1 for which Registry is directed to provide dasti summons. In addition to dasti, learned counsel for the appellant is allowed to serve notice on respondent no. 1 by registe
18 November 2015. Mr. Harsh Parashar, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No. 1. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit. List again on 29.1.2016.
29 January 2016. The respondent No.4 has already filed the counter affidavit. The Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within Date: 2016.01.30 12:15:33 TLT Reason: the period stipulated under the rules.
14 March 2016. The respondent Nos.2 & 3 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the r ules. The respondent No.4 has already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.1, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed
8 April 2022. In view of letter circulated on behalf of respondent No.4 to adjourn the matter to take steps to bring on record the Lrs. Of deceased respondent no.4 , matter is adjourned. List after four weeks.
9 May 2022. In view of letter circulated on behalf of Petitioner to adjourn the matter to enable the Petitioner to file application to bring the Lrs. of deceased respondent no.4, matter is adjourned. List after eight weeks.
22 August 2022. Delay in filing application for substitution is condoned. Abatement is set aside.
14 November 2022. Issue notice to the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.4, returnable within eight weeks. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR-CUM-PS
11 December 2023. Fresh notice will be issued to the unserved respondents on steps taken within ten days from today. Notice will be served by all modes, including dasti.
4 December 2024. Ld. Advocate, Mr. Danish Saifi, appearing on behalf of Mr.Sarad Kumar Singhania, Advocate-on-record has submitted that there is a change of Ld. counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and has sought time to file fresh vakalatnama on behalf of the said respondents. Let fresh vakalatnama be filed within a week. Ld. Counsel fo
24 February 2025. Service is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 4.1 to 4.8 & 4.10 but none has entered appearance. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are represented by the Ld.
16 April 2025. It has been submitted by Ld. counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 that time be granted to file vakalatnama. Let the same be filed as per rules. As per office report, Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed only fresh particulars for service on respondent No.4.9 but has not filed spare copy, despite the grant of last oppo
15 July 2025. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars for service on respondent No.4.9.
21 August 2025. Respondent nos. 2 & 3 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed spare copy for service on respondent no.4.9 alongwith an application seeking condonation of delay in filing spare copy. Application is hereby allowed. Consequently, delay is condoned. Issue notice immediately.
7 October 2025. Respondent nos. 2 & 3 are duly represented. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of unserved respondent no.4.9.
6 November 2025. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are duly represented. Time has been sought to file counter affidavit. Let the same be filed within four weeks. Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed spare copy for service on respondent No.4.9 and an application seeking condonation of delay in filing fresh particulars alongwith a letter of fres
9 December 2025. Respondent nos. 2 and 3 are duly represented. Ld. counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars for service on respondent no.4.9 by 16.12.2025. However, it has been submitted by the ld. counsel for the appellant that permission be granted to serve the said respondent through paper publication
20 January 2026. Respondent nos.2 & 3 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an application seeking deletion of the name of respondent no.4.9 from the array of parties. List the said application before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.
20 May 2026. 1. Interlocutory Application No.11111/2026 seeking deletion of respondent No.4.9 is allowed at the risk of the appellant. 2. Name of such respondent be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellant.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Liz Mathew, Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, Mr. Talha A. Rahman, Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Mr. Talha Abdul, Mr. Shaz Khan, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Kediya, Mr. M. Shaz Khan, Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Mr. Bilal Anwar Khan, Mr. Mohd.Shaz Khan, Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. M.P. Singh, Mr. C. D. Singh, Mr. Dhirendera Singh Parmar, Mr. Nishit Agrawal, Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Mr. Harsh Parashar, Mr. Shadan Farasat, Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Mojahid Kareem

Relief Sought & Granted

On 20 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Interlocutory Application No.11111/2026 seeking deletion of respondent No.4.9 is allowed at the risk of the appellant. 2. Name of such respondent be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellant.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 20 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 20 May 2026

Next hearing

7 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 23 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.