M/S. INDUSLND MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Versus CITY CABLE AND ORS. (C.A. 643/2012)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 643/2012

Case Record

C.A. 643/2012

M/S. INDUSLND MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Versus CITY CABLE AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

64 PDF renditions· 64 distinct judicial orders· 33 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S. INDUSLND MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LTD. Versus CITY CABLE & ORS.. C.A. 643/2012 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010344742011. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 33 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 13 July 2012 to 17 December 2025.

On 13 July 2012 the order records: Issue fresh notice with dasti service upon the unserved respondents, which is permitted to be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if process fee and spare copies are paid/filed before 25.7.2012, else
On 11 January 2013 the order records: Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 have been duly served through post but none appeared. Service report is awaited in respect of respondent No.1, issued through dasti.
On 2 September 2013 the order records: Service report in respect of respondent No. 1 is awaited from the concerned District Court. Reminder be issued. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are reported to be duly served through post but none appeared on their behalf.
On 13 December 2013 the order records: The learned counsel for the appellant is present in all the matters. None for the respondents.
On 4 April 2014 the order records: CA No.643-644/2012 The learned counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps to serve the unserved respondent No.1. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are reported to be duly and properly served but none appeared on their behalf.
On 5 January 2015 the order records: In respect of Respondent No. 1, service is awaited. Issue reminder.
On 5 February 2015 the order records: Signature Not Verified Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish the fresh and Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.02.09 complete address of respondent no.1. 16:43:19 IST Reason:
On 17 December 2025 the order records: 1. The appeals are dismissed in terms of the Signed Order placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

13 July 2012. Issue fresh notice with dasti service upon the unserved respondents, which is permitted to be served through the nearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if process fee and spare copies are paid/filed before 25.7.2012, else
26 September 2012. Process fee and spare copies to be filed before 8.10.2012, else list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If filed, issue notice as per earlier order and list again on | | |(S.G.SHAH) | | | |REGISTRAR | hj
3 December 2012. None for the parties. Affidavit of dasti to be filed. Four weeks' time granted.
11 January 2013. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 have been duly served through post but none appeared. Service report is awaited in respect of respondent No.1, issued through dasti.
6 February 2013. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has undertaken to file process fee and spare copies within a week. Notice be issued forthwith through the concerned District Court besides postal service. List again on 22.3.2013.
22 March 2013. CA No.643-644/2012 Service report in respect of respondent No.1 is awaited (notice issued by post on 20.2.2013). CA Nos.645-646/2012 Service report in respect of respondent No.3 is awaited (notice issued by post on 20.2.2013).
26 April 2013. Notice be reissued to respondent No.1 through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. Notice be reissued to respondent No.3 through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service.
15 July 2013. The learned counsel for the petitioner in all these batch of matters has undertaken to file the process fee and spare copies within two weeks. On compliance, notice be issued through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service.
2 September 2013. Service report in respect of respondent No. 1 is awaited from the concerned District Court. Reminder be issued. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are reported to be duly served through post but none appeared on their behalf.
17 October 2013. CA NOS. 643-44, 645-46, 647-48,649-650 OF 2012 The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is present. Await the return of the service of the notice from the concerned District Court as far as the unserved respondents except respondent No.4 are concerned. A reminder shall be issued.
19 November 2013. Three weeks' time is granted, as a final chance, to the learned counsel for the petitioner for furnishing the fresh and complete address of respondent No.4 and on compliance notice be issued forthwith through the concerned District court in addition to postal service. List again on 13.12.2013.
13 December 2013. The learned counsel for the appellant is present in all the matters. None for the respondents.
21 January 2014. Files not received. List again on 4.4.2014.
4 April 2014. CA No.643-644/2012 The learned counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps to serve the unserved respondent No.1. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are reported to be duly and properly served but none appeared on their behalf.
4 July 2014. Files not received. List again on 22.7.2014.
26 September 2014. Files not received. List again on 20.11.2014.
5 January 2015. In respect of Respondent No. 1, service is awaited. Issue reminder.
5 February 2015. Signature Not Verified Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish the fresh and Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.02.09 complete address of respondent no.1. 16:43:19 IST Reason:
24 March 2015. Fresh and complete address of respondent no.1 in ld. Counsel for the appellant has requested some more time to either furnish the better particulars, if available, else to file an application for serving them through substituted service. Appropriate steps be taken. Service of notice in the remaining three matters is co
5 August 2015. The ld. counsel for the appellant has requested t wo weeks time to file an application to serve unserv ed respondent No.1 in C.A.No.643-644, 649-650 of 2012 by way of publication. Appropriate steps be taken. Signature Not Verified List again on 14.10.2015.
5 August 2015. The ld. counsel for the appellant has requested t wo weeks time to file an application to serve unserv ed respondent No.1 in C.A.No.643-644, 649-650 of 2012 by way of publication. Appropriate steps be taken. Signature Not Verified List again on 14.10.2015.
14 October 2015. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant has requested some more time to file the application praying for serving respondent No.1 of C.A. No.643-644/2012 and C.A. No. 649-650/2012 by substituted mode. Be filed within two weeks and be processed thereafter as per rules. Registry to report the status of the remaining matters.
14 January 2016. Two weeks time is granted for curing the defects in the application for substituted service. Notices thereafter be issued. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2016.01.14 16:48:13 IST Reason: List again on 16.3.2016.
16 March 2016. Learned Counsel for appellant has not filed application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substit uted service of respondent no. 1 in C.A. Nos. 643-644 and 649-650 of 2012 so far, despite earlier order dated 14.1.2016 of this Court. As requested, two weeks time is granted for filing application for
8 July 2016. The ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks time to file an application for condonation of delay in filing application for substituted service in respect of respondent no.1. Be filed within two weeks time. Registry to process thereafter. Service of respondent nos. 2 to 4 in C.A. No.643-44 and 649-50 of 2012 is co
9 September 2016. Application for substituted service in respect of legal representatives of respondent no.1 in C.A.No.643-44/2012 and processed under rules.
10 November 2016. Application for substituted service on respondent no.1 in both matters is allowed. Notices accordingly be issued. None appears for respondent nos. 2 to 4 in both matters despite due service.
6 January 2017. Last opportunity of one week is granted for filing affidavit with proof of publication in respect of respondent no.1. None appears for respondent nos. 2 to 4 despite due service.
24 January 2017. None appears for respondent no.1 in C.A.No.643-644/2012 despite due service. Affidavit with proof of publication in respect of respondent no.1 in C.A.No.649-650/2012 has not been filed, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.
8 May 2017. All the respondents have been served, but none has entered appearance on their behalf. Registry to process the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court.
The record also contains 3 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Parikshit Kumar, Ms. Kavita Wadia, Mr Parikshit Kumar, Mr Abhinav Mukherjee, Mr Vaibhav Agnihotri, Mr Abhinav Mukerji, Ms Niharika Ahluwalia, Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Ms. Ravneet Kaur, Mr Aditya Singh, Ms Juhi Chawla

Relief Sought & Granted

On 17 December 2025 the order records: The appeals are dismissed in terms of the Signed Order placed on the file.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 17 Dec 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 17 Dec 2025

Final disposition

The appeals are dismissed in terms of the Signed Order placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 33 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.