M/S. HOSDURG RANGE KALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA XI-B THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM KOTTACHERRY, REP. BY ITS SEC Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ONLY I.As ARE LISTED IN CONNECTED MATTERS. ] (C.A. 203/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 203/2017

Case Record

C.A. 203/2017

M/S. HOSDURG RANGE KALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA XI-B THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM KOTTACHERRY, REP. BY ITS SEC Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ONLY I.As ARE LISTED IN CONNECTED MATTERS. ]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

C.A.Expedite trial Civil appeals Taxation

15 PDF renditions· 15 distinct judicial orders· 7 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S HOSDURG RANGE KALLU CHETHU THOZHILALI VYAVASAYA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. C.A. 203/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010062692016. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 7 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 23 August 2017 to 21 January 2026.

On 23 August 2017 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Parties have not filed the Statements of Case and the stipulated time has expired.
On 20 September 2017 the order records: One week's time, as prayed for, is granted to the appellant for filing the affidavit of valuation. List again on 26th of October, 2017.
On 26 October 2017 the order records: Appellant has filed the affidavit of valuation. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the affidavit of valuation has already been filed.
On 23 August 2021 the order records: Hearing of these appeals is expedited. List these appeals in the second week of July, 2022.
On 20 January 2026 the order records: IA No.59871/2025 IN SLP(C) No.16797/2023 @ Diary No.26022/2023, IA No.59868/2025 in Civil Appeal No.2959/2022, IA No.59829/2025 in No.2958/2022: List the matters on 21-1-2026 on top of the Board.
On 21 January 2026 the order records: 2960 OF 2022, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2959 OF 2022 AND SLP(C) No. 16797/2023 1. The appeals/SLP accordingly, stand dismissed as not pressed in terms of the signed order. NO.204/2017 AND SLP (C) NO.18858 OF 2023 1. Upon being mentioned these matters are taken on board.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

23 August 2017. Sole respondent is duly represented. Parties have not filed the Statements of Case and the stipulated time has expired.
20 September 2017. One week's time, as prayed for, is granted to the appellant for filing the affidavit of valuation. List again on 26th of October, 2017.
26 October 2017. Appellant has filed the affidavit of valuation. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the affidavit of valuation has already been filed.
23 August 2021. Hearing of these appeals is expedited. List these appeals in the second week of July, 2022.
11 April 2022. Leave granted. To be heard along with C.A. No. 203 of 2017.
20 January 2026. IA No.59871/2025 IN SLP(C) No.16797/2023 @ Diary No.26022/2023, IA No.59868/2025 in Civil Appeal No.2959/2022, IA No.59829/2025 in No.2958/2022: List the matters on 21-1-2026 on top of the Board.
21 January 2026. 2960 OF 2022, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2959 OF 2022 AND SLP(C) No. 16797/2023 1. The appeals/SLP accordingly, stand dismissed as not pressed in terms of the signed order. NO.204/2017 AND SLP (C) NO.18858 OF 2023 1. Upon being mentioned these matters are taken on board.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Ms. Athira G. Nair, Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Mr. Gireesh Kumar, Mr. Sanjay Singh, Ms. Sneha Mathew Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Gautam Sharma, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Ms. Nikhar Berry, Mr. Rabindra Kr. Mohanty, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr. Vikramjit Bannerjee, Mrs. Madhulika Upadhyay Aor

Relief Sought & Granted

On 21 January 2026 the order records: The appeals/SLP accordingly, stand dismissed as not pressed in terms of the signed order.

Subjects

Expedite trial Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 21 Jan 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 21 Jan 2026

Final disposition

The appeals/SLP accordingly, stand dismissed as not pressed in terms of the signed order.

Important procedural note

Written only from 7 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 4 other files in the folder were left out.