- 2 September 2025. 1. Though we are not inclined to entertain this petition on merits, notice is being issued to the State of Chhattisgarh, which is respondent No.1 in M.A. Nos.858-859/2021 since learned counsel appearing for the complainant has brought to the notice of this Court, the notices dated 28.05.2025 and 24.07.2025 (10.08.2025)
- 17 December 2025. Service is complete on State of Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.1 in M.A No.858-859/2021. Today Mr. Yashvardhan Shah, Ld. Counsel has entered appearance on behalf of Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for respondent No.1.
- 23 January 2026. Delay in filing spare copies is condoned. The learned counsel for the complainant makes a submission to the effect that despite the respondent having entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and received the amount, the immovable property is not being registered in the name of the complainant, on account of there bei
- 27 February 2026. 1. This is a contempt proceeding initiated for alleged violation of order dated 04.03.2025. The contemnor is present before this court. 2. IA No. 65049/2026 - The present applicant or intervener is an intruder in these proceeding, who claims to be mother of the contemnor, as such, the said application stands rejected.
- 25 May 2026. Not to be deleted from the already notified date i.e. 14.07.2026.
- 14 July 2026. List next week. (DEEPANSHU) (AVGV RAMU) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- 21 July 2026. List on 28.07.2026.
- 28 July 2026. List on 30.07.2026.
- 30 July 2026. 1. Heard the learned senior counsels appearing for the parties, the order dated 04.03.2025 was passed on the basis of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 31.12.2024. The respondent was personally present before this Court and categorically stated that the settlement had been entered into voluntarily, out of free will
- 20 August 2026. 1. Pursuant to the order dated 30.07.2026 passed by this Court, the contemnor has filed an affidavit under which she has tendered unconditional apology and to demonstrate her bona fides, she has stated in her affidavit that she would abide by the settlement agreement entered into between the parties and she would unequ
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Shivesh Kaushik, Mr. A. Abhiraj Ray, Mr. Arpit Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Beniwal, Mr. Harsh Dahiya, Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Ms. Sanchita Beniwal, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Pawan Singh Tanwar, Mr. Aamir Abbas Naajvi, Mr. Abhiraj Ray, Mr. Pulkit Duhan Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Ms. Mukta Gupta, Ms. Ashima Mandla, Ms. Mandakini Singh, Mr. Mohd. Faiz, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Ms. Vanshika Tiwari, Ms. Vanshika Tewari, Mr. Raghenth Basant, Ms. Hima Bhardwaj, Ms. Sristhi Agarwal
