M/S. DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD. Versus I W K (THAILAND) LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.MATTHIAS JUENGLING (ARBIT.PETITION 50/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · ARBIT.PETITION 50/2017

Case Record

ARBIT.PETITION 50/2017

M/S. DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD. Versus I W K (THAILAND) LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.MATTHIAS JUENGLING

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN

ARBIT.PETITION Appellate relief Contractual Obligations

29 PDF renditions· 29 distinct judicial orders· 29 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S. DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD. Versus I W K (THAILAND) LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.MATTHIAS JUENGLING. ARBIT.PETITION 50/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010367062017. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 29 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 6 December 2017 to 27 October 2025.

On 22 January 2018 the order records: Await service report from the Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of the sole respondent. List the matter again on 14.03.2018.
On 18 November 2019 the order records: Appearance :Ld. counsel for petitioner is present. None appeared for the Respondent.
On 16 February 2024 the order records: Service is still awaited in respect of sole respondent. In the meantime, Ld. Counsel for petitioner shall within a period of two weeks take appropriate steps.
On 2 September 2024 the order records: Service report from Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of the sole respondent is still awaited. Issue reminder in this regard. List again on 23.10.2024.
On 19 February 2025 the order records: Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for petitioner, to take fresh steps, for service on the sole respondent. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel for the petitioner that permission be granted to serve the sole respondent also through its official e-mail ID. Let appropriate application be moved in the above behalf
On 8 April 2025 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application seeking permission to serve the sole respondent through official e-mail I.D. Let the application be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders.
On 24 April 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s). 2. The learned counsel submits that though, serious attempts were made to serve the sole respondent by various modes, the respondent could not be served. He further submits that even an attempt was made to serve the sole respondent through Ministry of Law and Ju
On 27 October 2025 the order records: The Arbitration Petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

6 December 2017. Issue notice.
22 January 2018. Await service report from the Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of the sole respondent. List the matter again on 14.03.2018.
23 March 2018. Issue reminder to the Ministry of Law and Justice for service report of sole respondent. List the matter again on 09.05.2018.
9 May 2018. Await service report from the Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of the sole respondent. List the matter again on 31.07.2018.
31 July 2018. Issue reminder to the Ministry of Law and Justice for service report in respect of sole respondent. List again on 17.9.2018.
17 September 2018. Await service report from the Ministry of Law and Justice qua sole respondent. List the matter again on 14.11.2018.
15 November 2018. Service report from the Ministry of Law and Justice qua sole respondent is awaited. List the matter again on 18.01.2019.
18 January 2019. Issue reminder to Ministry of Law and Justice for service report of sole respondent. List the matter again on 06.03.2019.
6 March 2019. Service report from the Ministry of Law and Justice qua sole respondent is awaited. List the matter again on 11.07.2019.
11 July 2019. Await service report from Ministry of Law and Justice. Let the reminder be issued. List again on 18.11.2019.
18 November 2019. Appearance :Ld. counsel for petitioner is present. None appeared for the Respondent.
24 January 2020. Issue reminder to Ministry of law and Justice for service report in respect of sole respondent. List again on 25.3.2020.
17 March 2021. Issue reminder to Ministry of Law and Justice for service report in respect of sole respondent. List the matter again on 07.05.2021.
8 February 2023. Await service report from Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of sole respondent, who is abroad. List again on 8.5.2023.
16 March 2023. Await Service Report in respect of the sole respondent from Ministry of Law and Justice. List again on 02.05.2023.
2 May 2023. Await service report from Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of sole respondent. List again on 24.07.2023.
24 July 2023. Issue reminder to Ministry of Law and Justice for service report in respect of sole respondent. List again on 11.9.2023.
13 September 2023. Service report in respect of sole respondent is awaited. Let the reminder be issued.
8 November 2023. Service report in respect of the sole respondent is awaited. Let the reminder be issued.
16 February 2024. Service is still awaited in respect of sole respondent. In the meantime, Ld. Counsel for petitioner shall within a period of two weeks take appropriate steps.
9 April 2024. Service is still awaited from Ministry of Law and Justice. List again on 15.7.2024.
15 July 2024. Await service report from the Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of the sole respondent. List again on 02.09.2024.
2 September 2024. Service report from Ministry of Law and Justice in respect of the sole respondent is still awaited. Issue reminder in this regard. List again on 23.10.2024.
23 October 2024. Service report in respect of sole respondent is still awaited from the Ministry of Law and Justice List again on 19.2.2025.
19 February 2025. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for petitioner, to take fresh steps, for service on the sole respondent. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel for the petitioner that permission be granted to serve the sole respondent also through its official e-mail ID. Let appropriate application be moved in the above behalf
8 April 2025. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application seeking permission to serve the sole respondent through official e-mail I.D. Let the application be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders.
24 April 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s). 2. The learned counsel submits that though, serious attempts were made to serve the sole respondent by various modes, the respondent could not be served. He further submits that even an attempt was made to serve the sole respondent through Ministry of Law and Ju
20 May 2025. Despite due service on the sole respondent, there is no appearance. Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
27 October 2025. The Arbitration Petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, Mr. Mullapudi Rambabu, Mr. N. Eswara Rao, Ms. Vijayshree Pattnaik, Ms. Prity Kumari, Mr. Vijayshree Pattnaik, Ms. Prity Kumar, Mr. Mullapudi Rambhau, Ms. Priyanka Rani, Ms. Mahima Pandey, Mr. Challa Kodandaram, Mr. Praveen Kumar Sharma

Relief Sought & Granted

On 27 October 2025 the order records: The Arbitration Petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Subjects

Appellate relief Contractual Obligations

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 27 Oct 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 27 Oct 2025

Final disposition

The Arbitration Petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 29 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.