M/S. ABS MARINE SERVICES Versus ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION [ HEARD BY :- HON. J.B. PARDIWALA AND HON. K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ.] [HON. MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN WILL SIT IN SPECIAL BENCH IN COURT NO. 7 AT 3:30 P.M.] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES IN COURT NO. : 15 [ MATTERS SHOWN BEFORE THIS COURT IN THE FINAL LIST FOR 23.03.2026 BEFORE THE BENCH COMPRISING HON. RAJESH BINDAL AND HON. VIJAY BISHNOI, JJ. WILL NOW BE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING BY THIS BENCH EXCEPT PART-HEARD MATTERS, IF ANY ] . [ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 3:25 P.M. ] (C.A. 3658/2022)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3658/2022

Case Record

C.A. 3658/2022

M/S. ABS MARINE SERVICES Versus ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION [ HEARD BY :- HON. J.B. PARDIWALA AND HON. K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ.] [HON. MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN WILL SIT IN SPECIAL BENCH IN COURT NO. 7 AT 3:30 P.M.] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES IN COURT NO. : 15 [ MATTERS SHOWN BEFORE THIS COURT IN THE FINAL LIST FOR 23.03.2026 BEFORE THE BENCH COMPRISING HON. RAJESH BINDAL AND HON. VIJAY BISHNOI, JJ. WILL NOW BE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING BY THIS BENCH EXCEPT PART-HEARD MATTERS, IF ANY ] . [ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 3:25 P.M. ]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

13 PDF renditions· 13 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M/S. ABS MARINE SERVICES Versus ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION. C.A. 3658/2022 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010379112018. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 19 November 2018 to 23 March 2026.

On 4 January 2019 the order records: Await service/track report in respect of the sole respondent. List again on 17.1.2019.
On 17 January 2019 the order records: Service is not complete on the sole respondent. The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Jagdish Varan, appearing on behalf of Ms.G.Indira, Advocate-on-record appears for the sole respondent. He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks.
On 20 February 2019 the order records: Last opportunity is granted to the sole respondent for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court after completion of period of four weeks whether counter affidavit is filed or not as further opportunity stands declined.
On 2 May 2022 the order records: Application for permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures is allowed. Leave granted.
On 15 February 2024 the order records: Learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s) states that he has been recently briefed to appear in the case. List on 24.04.2024 (Wednesday).
On 9 October 2025 the order records: 1. We heard Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent. 2. The short point that falls for our consideration is whether clause 3.20 of the manning agreement more particularly the last pa
On 12 November 2025 the order records: 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.

Issues Before Court

The main question that arises for consideration is whether the reasoning of the High Court , as set out hereinabove, while allowing the Section 37 appeal of the respondent under the A&C Act, is correct in law?

Procedural History

19 November 2018. Issue notice.
4 January 2019. Await service/track report in respect of the sole respondent. List again on 17.1.2019.
17 January 2019. Service is not complete on the sole respondent. The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Jagdish Varan, appearing on behalf of Ms.G.Indira, Advocate-on-record appears for the sole respondent. He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks.
20 February 2019. Last opportunity is granted to the sole respondent for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court after completion of period of four weeks whether counter affidavit is filed or not as further opportunity stands declined.
2 May 2022. Application for permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures is allowed. Leave granted.
15 February 2024. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s) states that he has been recently briefed to appear in the case. List on 24.04.2024 (Wednesday).
24 April 2024. Time is sought on behalf of the respondent. List on 22nd August, 2024.
22 August 2024. List on 18th December, 2024. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS
9 October 2025. 1. We heard Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent. 2. The short point that falls for our consideration is whether clause 3.20 of the manning agreement more particularly the last pa
30 October 2025. List on 12-11-2025.
12 November 2025. 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.
23 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
23 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. V. Giri, Mr. Amar Gupta, Mr. Mayank Mishra, Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Mr. Sidharth Sethi, Ms. Vandana Anand, Ms. Pallavi Kumar, Mr. Kunal Saini, Mr. Avinash Das, Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Ms. Shivangi Pathak Advocates — Respondents: Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Ms. G. Indira, Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Mr. Susheel Joseph Cyriac, Ms. Uditha Chakravarthy, Ms. Indira Bhakar, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Mr. Vineet Singh, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee

Relief Sought & Granted

On 12 November 2025 the latest order on this record says: 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 23 Mar 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Mar 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.