- 25 August 2022. Delay in refiling the petition is condoned. Registry to proceed further.
- 5 September 2022. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners Mr. U. Hazarika would draw our attention to the finding regarding the question as to whether the structure was a permanent structure rendered by the trial court in the first round, which was under the Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972 and then contrast it with the findi
- 20 October 2022. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. Four weeks time, is granted to respondent no. 1 to file counter affidavit.
- 10 May 2024. The counsel for the respondent prays for and is granted four weeks time file counter affidavit.
- 10 July 2024. Heard Mr. Upamanyu Hazarika, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Respondent No.1 is represented by Mr. Kaushik Choudhury, learned counsel. We have also considered the pleadings in the application in respect of the suit property. Parties are to maintain status quo and third party rights should not be
- 25 February 2026. Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos. 2 to 7.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Dharitry Phookan, Mr. U. Hazarika, Mr. Upamanyu Hazarika, Ms. Lanutula Karanur, Mr. Ronmi Risom Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Kaushik Choudhury, Mr. Shantanu Jain, Mr. Saksham Garg, Mr. Asif Iqbal, Mr. Jyotirmoy Chatterjee, Ms. Aaheli Roy
