MOHANBHAI NANABHAI CHOKSY(D) TH:LRS. III-B SANJANWALA [P-2], [P-3] Versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. only I.A. No. 331554/2025 i.e., APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION of legal heirs of appellant no. 1 and I.A. No. 333424/2025 i.e., SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT are to be listed before Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber. SUBSTITUTION ABATEMENT [DIRECTION MATTERS] (C.A. 6347/2011)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 6347/2011

Case Record

C.A. 6347/2011

MOHANBHAI NANABHAI CHOKSY(D) TH:LRS. III-B SANJANWALA [P-2], [P-3] Versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. only I.A. No. 331554/2025 i.e., APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION of legal heirs of appellant no. 1 and I.A. No. 333424/2025 i.e., SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT are to be listed before Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber. SUBSTITUTION ABATEMENT [DIRECTION MATTERS]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

12 PDF renditions· 12 distinct judicial orders· 10 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

MOHANBHAI NANABHAI CHOKSY(D) TH. LRS. Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.. C.A. 6347/2011 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010140152011. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 10 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 7 November 2012 to 23 February 2026.

On 7 November 2012 the order records: Learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment so as to address arguments in the application. Adjourned for arguments, to be listed after four weeks.
On 10 December 2012 the order records: Office Report dated 28.06.2012 indicates that counsel for the appellants has not served a copy of Affidavit in reply to the application for impleadment on the counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. However, counsel for the appellants denies this fact and submits that he has already served the same to the counsel for Resp
On 12 August 2013 the order records: List the application along with the main matter, i.e., | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] | |
On 20 July 2023 the order records: On the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, post the matter for hearing on 06.09.2023.
On 13 September 2023 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent no.3 on the ground of medical emergency, list the matter on 01.11.2023.
On 1 November 2023 the order records: In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for respondent No.3 seeking an adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty of the arguing/instructing counsel, let the matter be listed on 29.11.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
On 29 November 2023 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellant(s) seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, post the matter on 24.01.2024.
On 23 February 2026 the order records: 1. Abatement is set aside. 2. Application seeking substitution of legal heirs of appellant no. 1 is allowed.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

7 November 2012. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment so as to address arguments in the application. Adjourned for arguments, to be listed after four weeks.
10 December 2012. Office Report dated 28.06.2012 indicates that counsel for the appellants has not served a copy of Affidavit in reply to the application for impleadment on the counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. However, counsel for the appellants denies this fact and submits that he has already served the same to the counsel for Resp
12 August 2013. List the application along with the main matter, i.e., | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] | |
22 March 2023. List the matter after three weeks.
20 July 2023. On the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, post the matter for hearing on 06.09.2023.
13 September 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent no.3 on the ground of medical emergency, list the matter on 01.11.2023.
1 November 2023. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for respondent No.3 seeking an adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty of the arguing/instructing counsel, let the matter be listed on 29.11.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
29 November 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellant(s) seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, post the matter on 24.01.2024.
15 February 2024. At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, post the matter next week.
23 February 2026. 1. Abatement is set aside. 2. Application seeking substitution of legal heirs of appellant no. 1 is allowed.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Kailash Pandey, Ms. Pooja Marwaha, Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Mr. K.V. Sreekumar, Mr. Anip Sachthey, Mr. Mohit Paul, Ms. Shagun Matta, Mr. Saakar Sardana, Mr. Shamik Sanjanwala, Mr. Saakaar Sardana, Mr. Shamik Shirishbhai Sanjanwala, Mr. Siddharth Srivastav Advocates — Respondents: Mr. S.C. Patel, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Jesal, Ms. Nandini Gupta, Mr. Anip Sachthey, Ms. Nandani Gupta, Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Mr. Ilesh Shukla, Mr. Chetanya Singh, Ms. Ria Sachthey, Mr. Chetan Sharma, Mr. Manav Jain

Relief Sought & Granted

On 23 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Abatement is set aside. 2. Application seeking substitution of legal heirs of appellant no. 1 is allowed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Feb 2026

Next hearing

4 Feb 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 10 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 2 other files in the folder were left out.