- 2 September 2014. Petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent Nos. 2 and 3 within two weeks. Office to issue notices. List again on 25.11.2014.
- 25 November 2014. As requested time extended by one week as last opportunity for taking fresh steps. List again on 12.1.2015.
- 10 April 2015. Counter affidavit of respondent nos. 1 and 3 is awaited. Be filed within four weeks as last opportunity.
- 10 July 2015. Respondent No.3 has filed the counter affidavit but not served on the other side. Be served within two weeks. Respondent No.1 has not filed the counter affidavit , despite last opportunity provided. Further opportunity is, therefore, declined.
- 16 September 2015. Opportunity of respondent no. 1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined vide the order dated 10 th July, Respondent no. 2 has already filed the counter affidavit. Counter affidavit of respondent no. 3 has also come on record however, copy thereof is yet to be served on the oth er side counsel. Be provided a
- 29 April 2016. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, list the matter after ten weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS
- 17 November 2017. Learned ASG says that he will look into the matter personally and discuss with Home Secretary, Ministry of India. List the matter after six weeks.
- 4 January 2018. On the request of learned counsel for the Union of India, list the matter after six weeks. Additional affidavit be filed in the meanwhile.
- 16 February 2018. List the matter for final disposal on a non-miscellaneous day in the month of July, 2018.
- 17 July 2018. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a detailed affidavit bringing out the full facts of the case and the grievance of the petitioner. There is no appearance on behalf of the State of Mizoram except when we were dictating the order.
- 7 December 2018. List the matter for final disposal on a non miscellaneous day in the month of March, 2019.
- 6 March 2019. List after six weeks as prayed for by the learned counsel for the parties.
- 28 August 2019. List after six weeks, as requested.
- 22 October 2019. In view of the request made in the letter circulated on behalf of the petitioner, list the matter in the last week of January, 2020 on a non miscellaneous day.
- 4 February 2020. Learned Additional Solicitor General on behalf of Union of India seeks time to file affidavit. Four weeks' time is given to file the same. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. List the matter on 7.04.2020.
- 7 July 2021. The learned counsel for the Union of India submits that on subsequent development,an additional affidavit is required to be filed. As requested, list the matter after four weeks.
- 28 September 2022. Put up on 17.10.2022. In the meantime, it will be open for the Union of India to file additional affidavit.
- 17 October 2022. Shri R. Venkataramani, learned Attorney General for India has pointed that counter by way of additional affidavit has been filed by Union of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to go through the same and, if required, respond to the same.
- 26 November 2024. List on 10-12-2024.
- 11 December 2024. As prayed for, the matter is adjourned, list after two weeks.
- 16 April 2025. This matter was last heard on 11th December, 2024. On that day, the learned Attorney General for India prayed for time to amicably resolve the dispute. It has been now more than four months. We would like to know the developments in the matter. Post this matter on 1st May, 2025 for final disposal on top of the Board.
- 1 May 2025. 1. Prima facie , it appears that the matter may not get resolved amicably and may have to be heard on merits. 2. For the time being, we post this matter after summer vacation.
- 24 July 2025. List the matter as Second Item on 13.08.2025.
- 13 August 2025. 1. Application for intervention is allowed. 2. Arguments concluded.
- 13 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 13 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. D. N. Goburdhan, Mr Prabal Bagchi, Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Mr. Lalremsanga N., Mr. Girija Ballav Das, Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Mr. Lal Ramtiamma, Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, Mr. Lalremsanga Nghaka, Mr. Lalrenkanga Nghaka, Dr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Mr. B.B. Pradhan Advocates — Respondents: Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Ms Mansa Singh, Mr Meenesh Kumar Dubey, Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Mr Pragyan Sharma, Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Ms. Gunwant Dara, Ms. Sushma Suri, Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, Mr. Pragyan Sharma, Mr. Shikhar Garg, Mr. Pulkit Prakash
