MEHRAJ UD DIN KUMAR Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD RATHER AND ANR. IN SLP(C) No. - 29153/2019 (CONMT.PET.(C) 850/2023)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · CONMT.PET.(C) 850/2023

Case Record

CONMT.PET.(C) 850/2023

MEHRAJ UD DIN KUMAR Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD RATHER AND ANR. IN SLP(C) No. - 29153/2019

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

CONMT.PET.(C)Contempt Civil Contempt Revision

21 PDF renditions· 21 distinct judicial orders· 21 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

MEHRAJ UD DIN KUMAR Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD RATHER & ANR.. CONMT.PET.(C) 850/2023 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010150512023. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 21 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 28 April 2023 to 31 August 2026.

On 28 April 2023 the order records: 1. Issue notice, returnable in eight weeks. 2. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
On 13 October 2023 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-State states that the entire amount of arrears would be paid within four weeks from today. 2. List this matter on 24.11.2023.
On 2 April 2024 the order records: 1. At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, two weeks' time is granted so as to enable the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. 2. List on 07.05.2024.
On 15 July 2024 the order records: 1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging the contempt of order dated 20 th May, 2022, whereby this Court had directed the respondents to clear the arrears within a period of eight weeks from the date of the said order. 2. Ms. Sanjana Saddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though as per
On 14 February 2025 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the disengagement of service of the petitioner has been categorically stayed by the High Court vide its order 2. If that be so, the petitioner would be required to be paid the minimum wages. The State cannot be permitted to take the services of the petitioner without pa
On 13 October 2025 the order records: 1. Ms. Sanjana Saddy. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 14.02.2025, the petitioner has not been paid even a penny. 2. Vide our order dated 14.02.2025, we had examined the effect of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court dated 15.01.2024. After
On 15 April 2026 the order records: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that compliance has been effected only with respect to the present contempt petitioner (respondent no.1 in the special leave petition) and not with respect to the other respondents in the special leave petition, who have also been granted relief. Mr. P.N. Razdan lear
On 4 August 2026 the order records: A request for adjournment has been made on behalf of learned counsel for the respondent(s) on personal grounds. The request is accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for an early date, as according to her despite several orders directing the respondent(s) to comply and also there being a direction to the

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

28 April 2023. 1. Issue notice, returnable in eight weeks. 2. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
25 August 2023. List on 15.09.2023.
22 September 2023. As prayed, list this matter on 13.10.2023.
13 October 2023. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-State states that the entire amount of arrears would be paid within four weeks from today. 2. List this matter on 24.11.2023.
24 November 2023. 1. As prayed, three weeks' time is granted, by way of last indulgence, to comply with the order dated 20.05.2023. 2. List this matter on 08.01.2024.
8 January 2024. As prayed, list after two weeks to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to take instructions from the petitioner.
2 April 2024. 1. At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, two weeks' time is granted so as to enable the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. 2. List on 07.05.2024.
7 May 2024. List in the next week. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANJU KAPOOR) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
17 May 2024. As prayed, list this matter after immediately ensuing summer vacation.
8 July 2024. List on 15.7.2024.
15 July 2024. 1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging the contempt of order dated 20 th May, 2022, whereby this Court had directed the respondents to clear the arrears within a period of eight weeks from the date of the said order. 2. Ms. Sanjana Saddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though as per
14 February 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the disengagement of service of the petitioner has been categorically stayed by the High Court vide its order 2. If that be so, the petitioner would be required to be paid the minimum wages. The State cannot be permitted to take the services of the petitioner without pa
25 August 2025. List on 29.08.2025.
29 August 2025. At the request of the learned counsel for the respondent(s), list after three weeks.
13 October 2025. 1. Ms. Sanjana Saddy. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 14.02.2025, the petitioner has not been paid even a penny. 2. Vide our order dated 14.02.2025, we had examined the effect of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court dated 15.01.2024. After
6 April 2026. List the petition on 13.04.2026.
13 April 2026. Not taken up. List on 15th April, 2026.
15 April 2026. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that compliance has been effected only with respect to the present contempt petitioner (respondent no.1 in the special leave petition) and not with respect to the other respondents in the special leave petition, who have also been granted relief. Mr. P.N. Razdan lear
15 July 2026. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e. 4th August, 2026.
4 August 2026. A request for adjournment has been made on behalf of learned counsel for the respondent(s) on personal grounds. The request is accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for an early date, as according to her despite several orders directing the respondent(s) to comply and also there being a direction to the
31 August 2026. Not taken up. List on 11.09.2026.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Sanjana Saddy, Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wani, Mr. Sanyat Lodha, Ms. Surbhi Arora, Ms. Shivani Mehta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, Mr. Rushab Aggarwal, Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Mr. Astik Gupta, Ms. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr. Japnish Singh Bhatia, Mr. Aashish Chojar, Ms. Alka Chojar, Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Mr. Vaibhav Sabharwal, Mr. G.M. Kawoosa, Mr. Palak Mittal

Relief Sought & Granted

On 31 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: Not taken up. List on 11.09.2026.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Contempt Civil Contempt Revision

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 31 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 31 Aug 2026

Next hearing

23 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 21 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.