- 2 July 2019. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment of four weeks' on the ground of sudden demise in his family, let the matter be listed after four weeks.
- 2 August 2019. Issue notice, only to determine the alimony.
- 18 September 2019. Service of notice is complete qua common sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed thus, matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
- 9 May 2022. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent seeking adjournment, list these petitions after eight weeks.
- 5 September 2022. As prayed, list on 16.09.2022.
- 16 September 2022. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, list after eight weeks. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR-CUM-PS
- 14 November 2022. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, list after four weeks. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR-CUM-PS
- 7 November 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, the matters stand adjourned for two weeks.
- 19 January 2024. List after two weeks, on the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
- 5 February 2024. In these matters, limited notice was issued on 02 nd August, 2019 only for determining the quantum of alimony. Now, the parties want to take recourse to the process of mediation and they have expressed their desire for mediation by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, a former Judge of this Court.
- 25 March 2025. 1. Mediation is in progress, 2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray for an adjournment. Prayer is allowed. 3. List the matter on 09.5.2025.
- 9 May 2025. 1. It is submitted that the mediation is in progress. 2. List on 04.08.2025.
- 4 August 2025. 1. It is informed that mediation is in progress. 2. List on 26.09.2025.
- 26 September 2025. 1. It is submitted that the Mediation is in progress. 2. List on 10.11.2025.
- 10 November 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that mediation has failed. 2. As prayed for, list on 17.11.2025.
- 17 November 2025. 1. We are informed that the Mediation has failed. 2. Having perused the material available on record, we are of the considered view that order dated 02.08.2019 needs to be recalled. Ordered accordingly.
- 15 December 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
- 6 February 2026. Common sole respondent is duly represented. Process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
- 9 March 2026. As last opportunity, learned counsel for the appellant is directed to file requisite spare copies in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 2 by 16.03.2026. Original records of the High Court and the Trial Court have not been received.
- 7 April 2026. Service report from High Court has not been received yet in respect of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Let reminder be issued.
- 30 April 2026. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars for issuance of notice to respondent No.1 on or before 7.5.2026. As per service report received from High Court, Respondent No.
- 25 May 2026. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 2 on or before 01.06.2026, as last opportunity. Scanned original records of the High Court and the Trial Court have been received. Let soft copy of the same be provided to the learned coun
- 7 August 2026. 1. On the motion made by learned counsel for the appellant, name of respondent No.2 is permitted to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellant. 2. Amended memo be filed within a period of two weeks.
- 2 September 2026. Respondent no. 2 has been deleted vide the Hon'ble Judge-in Chamber's order dated 07.08.2026. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed proof of service upon Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, learned counsel for respondent no. 1, in terms of the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber's order dated 07.08.2026.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Babul Kumar, Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Mr. Nagendra Rai, Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Mr. Y. Lokesh, Mr. P. Abinesh Karthik, Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhayay, Ms. Sneha Ravi Iyer, Mr. Y.Lokesh, Mr. V.Sibi Kargil, Mr. V.Kandha Prabhu, Mr. Arun Singh Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Prapti Allagh, Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Mr. S. Hariharan, Ms. Prapti A., Mr. S.Hariharan, Mr. Amaan Shreyas, Ms. Yashashwini Chauhan, Mr. Shivang Goel, Mr. Vikash Singh, Mr. Hari Haran, Mr. Angel Bharadwal, Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran
