THE MEDICAL COUNSEL OF INDIA Versus SIMMONS DEBBARMA . AND ORS. (C.A. 4376/2016)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 4376/2016

Case Record

C.A. 4376/2016

THE MEDICAL COUNSEL OF INDIA Versus SIMMONS DEBBARMA . AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

49 PDF renditions· 49 distinct judicial orders· 20 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

THE MEDICAL COUNSEL OF INDIA Versus SIMMONS DEBBARMA . & ORS.. C.A. 4376/2016 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010198452012. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 20 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 27 July 2016 to 16 January 2026.

On 27 July 2016 the order records: Respondent Nos.1, 2, 12 to 14 and 16 to 22 are duly represented. Registry to update the database regarding the name of the Ld. Counsel appearing for the respondents.
On 4 November 2019 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps alongwith fresh and complete address of respondent No.15 within two weeks, as last opportunity. If fresh steps are not taken with fresh and complete address within two weeks, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders. If f
On 5 February 2020 the order records: The counsel for the appellant has not taken fresh steps and has not supplied complete address of Respondent No. 15 in CA No. 4377/16.Apparently, even service upon the R-15 has not been effected.
On 6 May 2025 the order records: All respondents (Counsel elevated as the Judge, High Court) Re-issue notice for alternative arrangement(counsel elevated as Judge, High Court) in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Respondent nos. 7 to 10 are duly represented.
On 1 August 2025 the order records: CA No.4376/2016 Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent nos.1 and 2. Respondent nos. 7 to 10 are duly represented.
On 27 October 2025 the order records: C.A No.4376/2016 Respondent nos. 7 to 10 are duly represented. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time as last opportunity to file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent nos. 1 & 2.
On 28 November 2025 the order records: Ld. counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 has been designated as Judge. As per office report, ld. counsel for the appellant has not filed fresh particulars for alternative arrangement in respect of the said respondents despite last opportunity having been granted. However, it has been submitted by the ld. Advocate-on rec
On 16 January 2026 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that an application seeking alternative service by way of paper publication has already been filed. Registry to verify. If so filed, process as per rules.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

27 July 2016. Respondent Nos.1, 2, 12 to 14 and 16 to 22 are duly represented. Registry to update the database regarding the name of the Ld. Counsel appearing for the respondents.
29 September 2016. Despite last opportunity having been granted, spare copies for service of respondent Nos.4, 6, 23 and 25 to 28 have not been filed. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions alongwith appropriate office report showing the status of all the remaining respo
11 November 2016. List the matters after two weeks. (SAPNA BISHT) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SR. P.A.
28 November 2016. The matter is adjourned for two weeks. In the meantime, the learned counsel for the appellant to file an application for condonation of delay in filing spare copies of appeal.
14 December 2016. As prayed for, list after one week. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (MADHU NARULA) SR.P.A.
16 January 2017. Delay condoned. Steps to be taken by the appellant to complete service on Respondent Nos. 4, 6, 23, 25-28.
20 April 2018. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent no.4. Reminder be issued. Ld. Counsel, Mr Alok Kumar appearing on behalf of Mr Shuvodeep Roy, Advocate-on-record appears for respondent no.18-State of Tripura and submitted that vakalatnama and counter affidavit have been filed already.
7 August 2018. Service is complete on respondent no.4 but none has entered appearance. Service is complete on respondent nos.14 and 17 but none has entered appearance.
27 September 2018. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 12 and 15 in C.A.No.4377/2016 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 30.11.2018.
30 November 2018. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not taken fresh steps for effecting service on respondent nos. 12 and 15 in CA No.4377/2016 despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, registry to process the matter as per rules for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate orders.
2 January 2019. Delay in filing the spare copies is condoned.
11 April 2019. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 12 and 15. Reminder be issued. List again on 22.7.2019.
22 July 2019. Service is complete on respondent no.12 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps alongwith fresh address to effect service on respondent no.15 within two weeks time.
4 November 2019. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps alongwith fresh and complete address of respondent No.15 within two weeks, as last opportunity. If fresh steps are not taken with fresh and complete address within two weeks, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders. If f
5 February 2020. The counsel for the appellant has not taken fresh steps and has not supplied complete address of Respondent No. 15 in CA No. 4377/16.Apparently, even service upon the R-15 has not been effected.
6 May 2025. All respondents (Counsel elevated as the Judge, High Court) Re-issue notice for alternative arrangement(counsel elevated as Judge, High Court) in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Respondent nos. 7 to 10 are duly represented.
1 August 2025. CA No.4376/2016 Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent nos.1 and 2. Respondent nos. 7 to 10 are duly represented.
27 October 2025. C.A No.4376/2016 Respondent nos. 7 to 10 are duly represented. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time as last opportunity to file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent nos. 1 & 2.
28 November 2025. Ld. counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 has been designated as Judge. As per office report, ld. counsel for the appellant has not filed fresh particulars for alternative arrangement in respect of the said respondents despite last opportunity having been granted. However, it has been submitted by the ld. Advocate-on rec
16 January 2026. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that an application seeking alternative service by way of paper publication has already been filed. Registry to verify. If so filed, process as per rules.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Ms. Vara Gaur, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Vriti Jindal, Mr Prasanna Mohan, Mr Abhishek, Mr Dhawal Mohan, Mr Prateek Bhatia, Mr. Abhishek Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Ms. Varsha Poddar, Mr. Gopal Singh, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mr. Ravi Bhushan, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Neha, Mr. Milind Kumar, Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Mr Shuvodeep Roy, Mr Rituraj Biswas, Mr. Shuvodeep Roy

Relief Sought & Granted

On 5 February 2020 the order records: 2/' The appeal so far as it relates to the said respondent is hereby dismissed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 16 Jan 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 16 Jan 2026

Next hearing

27 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 20 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 12 other files in the folder were left out.