- 2 September 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners who are the in-laws of respondent no. 1 i.e. husband and his family members. 2. Learned Counsel submits that the complaint was lodged by respondent no. 1-wife at Hajipur, Bihar.
- 28 October 2025. 1. At the request of the learned counsel for the respondent(s), the matters stand adjourned to enable him to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. 2. At the oral request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, proforma respondent nos. 2 to 5 are deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petiti
- 12 November 2025. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are agreeable for referring the matter(s) to mediation for exploring the possibility of a settlement. We hereby refer the dispute to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre for initiation, conduct and conclusion of the mediation proceedings. 2. The First meeting for init
- 19 January 2026. The transfer petitions are disposed of in terms of the signed order placed on the file.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, Mr. Md. Aabid Hussain, Mr. Yash Singhania, Mr. Abid Hussain, Mrs. Rashmi Singhania, Ms. Rashmi Singhania, Mrs. Rashmi Sighania Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Subhro Sanyal, Ms. Anki Kashyap, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Ms. Nitu Sharma, Ms. Jyoti Verma, Mr. Arvind Anand, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Deepmala
