- 4 July 2018. Issue notice. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned order passed by the High Court shall remain stayed.
- 20 August 2018. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on the sole respondent within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued.
- 10 October 2018. Service is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
- 21 February 2023. Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the petitioners submits that the present matters pertains to the interpretation of the provisions of Section 5(1) and Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 (for short “PMLA Act”). He further submits that the High Court erred in impor
- 29 March 2023. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner in connected items seeking adjournment, the matter is adjourned by three weeks.
- 21 April 2023. In view of letter circulated in Diary No. 5616 of 2019 (Item No. 43.1) by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking adjournment to place on record subsequent events, facts and developments which are necessary for the adjudication of the matters, the matters stand adjourned by four weeks.
- 31 January 2024. Leave granted.
- 23 September 2024. Service is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks' time to file affidavit of valuation as well as Ad-valorem court fee.
- 11 December 2024. Service is complete on the sole respondent, but none has entered appearance. Four weeks time, as a last opportunity, is granted to Ld.
- 17 January 2025. Post before a Bench of which Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma is not a member, after seeking orders from Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India.
- 10 March 2026. The matter(s) be listed before a Bench of which one of us (Alok Aradhe, J.) is not a member.
- 16 March 2026. 1. Issue notice.
- 2 September 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeks and is permitted to withdraw this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed, as withdrawn.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Mr. Manoj Singh, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Ms Shefali Sethi, Ms. Shefali Sethi, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Ms. Shradha Deshmukh, Mr. Zoheb Hussain Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Liz Mathew, Ms. Stuti Gujral, Ms. Sonali Jain, Ms. Roopali Lakhotia, Ms. Mallika Agarwal, Ms. Bagavathy Vennimalai, Mr. N.venkataraman, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Ms. Shradha Deshmukh, Mr. Sandeep Kr. Mahapatra