MARAGADHAM Versus PERIYARAJA AND ORS. AND ORS. (C.A. 12190/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 12190/2025

Case Record

C.A. 12190/2025

MARAGADHAM Versus PERIYARAJA AND ORS. AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

33 PDF renditions· 33 distinct judicial orders· 25 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

MARAGADHAM Versus PERIYARAJA & ORS.. C.A. 12190/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010307102015. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 25 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 26 July 2017 to 29 July 2026.

On 26 July 2017 the order records: Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time, as a last chance, to take fresh steps for service in respect of all the respondents. List the matter on 7th September, 2017.
On 1 October 2018 the order records: Service of notice is complete qua respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr. R. Gopala Krishnan, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. He seeks and is given one week's time to file vakalatnama and four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
On 30 November 2018 the order records: Four weeks' time is given to learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
On 31 January 2019 the order records: Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to file counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No. 5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
On 29 March 2019 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
On 10 February 2023 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent no.5 but none has entered appearance.
On 20 November 2024 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 to 3 have filed counter affidavit. Legal representative of deceased respondent No.4 is already on record as respondent No.2 vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated 1.10.2024.
On 15 July 2026 the order records: Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

26 July 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time, as a last chance, to take fresh steps for service in respect of all the respondents. List the matter on 7th September, 2017.
7 September 2017. Two weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to all the unserved respondents. List the matter again on 02.11.2017.
2 November 2017. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps for the service of notice to all the respondents despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders. List thereafter.
11 December 2017. Delay condoned.
29 January 2018. Await the return of service of notice already issued to all the respondents. List the matter again on 20.02.2018.
20 February 2018. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of all the respondents within two weeks. List the matter again on 12.04.2018.
12 April 2018. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 20.02.2018 of this Court in respect of all the respondents. List the matter again on 06.07.2018.
11 July 2018. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the fresh particulars and to take fresh steps for the service of notice to all the respondents despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders. List therea
20 August 2018. Delay condoned. (LAYA RAWAT) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
1 October 2018. Service of notice is complete qua respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr. R. Gopala Krishnan, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. He seeks and is given one week's time to file vakalatnama and four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
30 November 2018. Four weeks' time is given to learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
31 January 2019. Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to file counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No. 5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
29 March 2019. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have already filed counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete qua respondent No.5 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
14 October 2019. Re-notify next week. (SUSHMA KUMARI BAJAJ) (PRADEEP KUMAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
24 October 2019. Issue notice on IA No. 30532/2019 for condonation of delay in filing substitution and setting aside abatement and IA No. 15757/2019 for substitution to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.4.
9 December 2019. Delay in filing spare copy is condoned. Notice be issued immediately. List again on 16.3.2020.
10 February 2023. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent no.5 but none has entered appearance.
12 July 2024. Learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.1 to 3 prays for time to file reply to the application for setting aside abatement. Two weeks' time is granted to do the needful, list the matter thereafter.
1 October 2024. 1. For the reasons assigned in the applications, subject to just exceptions, the applications are allowed. 2. Application for setting aside abatement is allowed.
20 November 2024. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 have filed counter affidavit. Legal representative of deceased respondent No.4 is already on record as respondent No.2 vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated 1.10.2024.
19 September 2025. Leave granted. As the matter is ripe for disposal, list on 03.12.2025.
5 February 2026. List on 18.02.2026. Matter shall retain its position on that date.
15 July 2026. Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
29 July 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
29 July 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. G. Balaji, Ms. Vaishali Jain, Ms. Shiva Vijaya Kumar, Mr. Tomy Chacko, Ms. Sjhiva Vijaya Kumar, Mr. Divyanshu Singh, Mr. Shiva Vijaya Kumar, Mr. Neeleshwar Pavani, Mr. Muthuvel Palani, Ms. Jyotika Malhotra, Mr. Neeleshwar Parvani, Ms. Arzu Paul Advocates — Respondents: Mr. R. Gopala Krishnan, Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan, Mr. R. Sudhinder, Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Justice Sanjeev

Relief Sought & Granted

On 15 July 2026 the latest order on this record says: Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 29 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 29 Jul 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 25 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 3 other files in the folder were left out.