- 4 August 2025. 1. Petitioners lay challenge to the judgment and order dated 23-05-2025 in CWP No. 10327/2022 titled “Malkit Singh & Anr. Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh & Ors. “passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh.
- 19 September 2025. 1. Let counter affidavit be filed within two weeks. 2. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within one week thereafter.
- 16 October 2025. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 19 November 2025. 1. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh shall file his personal affidavit dealing with each one of the issues highlighted by the petitioner. He shall also ensure that such of those allotees who have not been allotted vending sites/licenses in terms of the Street Vendors (Protection of livelihood and Regu
- 4 December 2025. Affidavit of the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh is stated to have been filed on-line, copies whereof have been handed over to us during the course of the proceedings. Let Mr. Shubham Bhalla, learned AOR ascertain as to whether there is any mechanism in place whereby the residents of different sectors o
- 11 December 2025. List on 15.12.2025.
- 15 December 2025. 1. IA No.320726/2025 for impleadment & IA No.320727/2025 for permission to file impleadment application, are allowed. The applicants are impleaded as party respondent nos.6 to 46 in this petition. The cause title be amended accordingly. 2. Despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of the Union Territory of Ch
- 16 December 2025. 1. The vendors-newly added respondents (applicants in IA No.320726/2025) shall positively remove their vending wares within next 48 hours and shift to the allotted sites in the vending zone. Such of those, who have yet not been allotted sites within the vending zone, shall pursue the matter with the concerned Authority
- 17 December 2025. 1. We have heard learned senior counsel/learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Mr. Shubham Bhalla, learned counsel, submits that the time for complying with the order dated 16.12.2025 passed by this Court may be extended by one week. Ordered accordingly. Let an affidavit of compliance be filed within two weeks.
- 9 April 2026. SANJAY KAROL J., Leave granted. PRELUDE 2. To conceive of street vendors as units that can be removed or relocated at the ' drop of a hat ' would be an incorrect use of power, either judicial or administrative . They are not solely economic units; they are people trying to earn an honest living in cities that often off
- 27 April 2026. 1. The affidavit filed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh is as vague as it could be. Not only, it conceals and not reflect the true state of affairs existing at the ground level, but also does not disclose the action taken in implementing the orders passed by this Court; the High Court; as also the
- 29 April 2026. 1. We are not satisfied with the affidavit filed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh. We are also not satisfied with the action taken by Town Vending Committee, Chandigarh. 2. The Chairperson of the Appellate Forum of the Grievance Redressal Resolution Committee (GRDRC), Chandigarh shall remain prese
- 5 May 2026. 1. Having perused the note submitted by the learned amicus curiae and interacted with t he Chairperson of the Appellate Forum of the Grievance Redressal and Disputes Resolution Committee(in short ”GRDRC”), Chandigarh, who is physically present before us, we are of the considered view that the presence of other stakehol
- 12 May 2026. 1. We have interacted with the following officers: (i) Mr. Mandeep Singh Brar, the Secretary (Local Government & Home), Chandigarh;
- 1 July 2026. 1. On 9 th April 2026, we had passed a detailed order , recognising that the efforts made by the respondent -State had borne some fruit. It was observed that any act by the State ought to ensure that there is minimum disruption of livelihood with adequate sense of fairness and responsibility . If the zones are identifi
- 1 July 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 3 August 2026. 1. On 1 st July, 2026, this Court had issued a number of directions, after having considered the affidavits filed by the authorities of the respondent. We had placed the matter for compliance and as such the same came up today. 2. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh has reported compliance of the direct
- 3 August 2026. 1. Appeal is disposed of in terms of signed order. 2. In view of the disposal of the appeal, all pending application(s) alongwith application(s) for intervention/impleadment shall also stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Mallika Prabhakar, Mr. Gorang Goyal, Mr. Anmol Rattan Dhillon, Mr. Navraj Guron, Mr. Anmol Ratan Dhillon, Mr. Nauraj Guron Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Krishna Kant Dubey, Mr. S.N.Terdal, Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Mr. Bhuvan Kapoor, Mr. Varun Chugh, Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, Ms. Ragini Sharma, Mr. Alex N.dass, Ms. Neha Verma, Mr. Alex Noel Dass, Ms. Gauri Bedi
