THE MADAI CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK EMPLOYEE XI-A WELFARE Versus THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER . AND ORS. HARSHAD V. HAMEED[R-2] (C.A. 2933/2019)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2933/2019

Case Record

C.A. 2933/2019

THE MADAI CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK EMPLOYEE XI-A WELFARE Versus THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER . AND ORS. HARSHAD V. HAMEED[R-2]

SH. APOORV SINGH

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Service matters

28 PDF renditions· 28 distinct judicial orders· 15 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

THE MADAI CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK EMPLOYEE WELFARE Versus THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER . & ORS.. C.A. 2933/2019 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010046672017. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 15 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 7 January 2019 to 23 July 2026.

On 7 January 2019 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, list the matter after three weeks.
On 8 March 2019 the order records: Leave granted. The Stay application be posted for hearing on 29.03.2019.
On 29 March 2019 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by the counsel for respondent No.1, list the matters after two weeks to enable the counsel to file reply affidavit. Ad-interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
On 30 September 2019 the order records: Heard counsel for the parties on the prayer for interim relief. This Court had granted ad interim relief on 08.05.2017, whereby the interim arrangement as it operated during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court was to continue.
On 22 October 2019 the order records: Appearance: Mr. Azhar Assees, Ld. Counsel present on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. G. Prakash, Ld. Counsel present on behalf of the Respondent.
On 16 September 2025 the order records: 1. The delay of 29 days in filing the Special Leave Petition is condoned. Accordingly, IA No. 215483/2025 is allowed. 2. Leave granted.
On 10 October 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the order passed by this Court in an interim order permitting the petitioner to continue as member of the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 and the Employees Provident Fund Pension Scheme, 1995, until further orders.
On 23 July 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 & 3 to 7 are duly represented. Service was complete on respondent nos. 2,8,9 and 12 in December, 2025 but none has entered appearance.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

7 January 2019. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, list the matter after three weeks.
1 February 2019. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, hearing is deferred for two weeks. List the matter after two weeks.
18 February 2019. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, list the matter after two weeks.
8 March 2019. Leave granted. The Stay application be posted for hearing on 29.03.2019.
29 March 2019. In view of the letter circulated by the counsel for respondent No.1, list the matters after two weeks to enable the counsel to file reply affidavit. Ad-interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
30 September 2019. Heard counsel for the parties on the prayer for interim relief. This Court had granted ad interim relief on 08.05.2017, whereby the interim arrangement as it operated during the pendency of the appeal before the High Court was to continue.
22 October 2019. Appearance: Mr. Azhar Assees, Ld. Counsel present on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. G. Prakash, Ld. Counsel present on behalf of the Respondent.
25 February 2025. 1. List on 18.03.2025 for final disposal. 2. Let SLP(C) (D) No.30080/2024 be also listed along with the present matters on the next date of hearing.
25 March 2025. On the joint request of the parties, put up on 08.04.2025, at the top of the Board.
8 April 2025. On account of the bereavement in the family of the learned counsel for respondent No.4, list after two weeks.
16 September 2025. 1. The delay of 29 days in filing the Special Leave Petition is condoned. Accordingly, IA No. 215483/2025 is allowed. 2. Leave granted.
9 October 2025. IA NO.241991/2025 IN SLP(C) NO. 19874/2024 Let the matter be listed on the tentative date shown, i.e. 10.10.2025.
10 October 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the order passed by this Court in an interim order permitting the petitioner to continue as member of the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 and the Employees Provident Fund Pension Scheme, 1995, until further orders.
21 January 2026. As prayed, list after two weeks. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
23 July 2026. Respondent nos. 1 & 3 to 7 are duly represented. Service was complete on respondent nos. 2,8,9 and 12 in December, 2025 but none has entered appearance.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prithu Garg, Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, Mr. Sayid Marzook Bafaki, Mr. Harish Beeran, Mr. Mushtaq Salim, Mr. Usman Ghani Khan, Mr. R.S. Jena, Mr. Haris Beeran, Mr. Azhar Assees, Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. John Mathai, Mr. Anand B. Menon Advocates — Respondents: Mr. G. Prakash, Mr. Jishnu M.L., Mrs. Priyanka Prakash, Mrs. Beena Prakash, Ms. Dharitry Phookan, Mrs. Beenal Prakash, Mr. Prithu Garg, Mr. Siddharth Mehta, Mr. Antrix Singh, Mr. Aman Lekhi, Mr. S. Ray, Mr. P. Garg

Relief Sought & Granted

On 16 September 2025 the order records: The delay of 29 days in filing the Special Leave Petition is condoned. Accordingly, IA No. 215483/2025 is allowed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay Service matters

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Jul 2026

Next hearing

4 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 15 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 7 other files in the folder were left out.