M.R. VASUMATHI Versus THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND ORS. [ HEARD BY : HON. DIPANKAR DATTA AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ. ] ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES (C.A. 1606/2026)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 1606/2026

Case Record

C.A. 1606/2026

M.R. VASUMATHI Versus THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND ORS. [ HEARD BY : HON. DIPANKAR DATTA AND HON. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ. ] ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

14 PDF renditions· 14 distinct judicial orders· 14 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

M.R. VASUMATHI Versus THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER & ORS.. C.A. 1606/2026 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010227012020. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 14 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 15 December 2020 to 9 June 2026.

On 15 December 2020 the order records: Abatement is set aside. Delay condoned.
On 4 February 2022 the order records: Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. Four weeks time is granted to respondent no. 1 to file the counter affidavit.
On 9 March 2022 the order records: Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. Four weeks time, as a last chance is granted to respondent no.
On 22 April 2022 the order records: Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 submits that counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of said respondent.
On 9 December 2022 the order records: IA No. 37771/2022 Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application is allowed. Delay condoned. IA No. 37768/2022 Application for substitution is allowed. Issue notice to the impleaded respondents, returnable in six weeks.
On 11 August 2023 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted four weeks time to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of the legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 7. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks time to file spare copies. If filed, issue notice through usual mode immediat
On 22 September 2023 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have already filed counter affidavit. Item no.8 Service is complete on respondent nos.3 to 6, 7.1 and 8 to 10 but none has entered appearance.
On 10 February 2026 the order records: 1. Leave granted. 2. Arguments concluded.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

15 December 2020. Abatement is set aside. Delay condoned.
4 February 2022. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. Four weeks time is granted to respondent no. 1 to file the counter affidavit.
9 March 2022. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. Four weeks time, as a last chance is granted to respondent no.
22 April 2022. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 submits that counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of said respondent.
9 December 2022. IA No. 37771/2022 Application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application is allowed. Delay condoned. IA No. 37768/2022 Application for substitution is allowed. Issue notice to the impleaded respondents, returnable in six weeks.
11 August 2023. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted four weeks time to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of the legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 7. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks time to file spare copies. If filed, issue notice through usual mode immediat
22 September 2023. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have already filed counter affidavit. Item no.8 Service is complete on respondent nos.3 to 6, 7.1 and 8 to 10 but none has entered appearance.
8 January 2024. Post the matter for hearing on 06.02.2024.
6 February 2024. Post the matter on 07.05.2024.
27 January 2025. List on 18.03.2025 (NMD).
3 February 2026. List the special leave petition on 10th February, 2026.
10 February 2026. 1. Leave granted. 2. Arguments concluded.
9 June 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
9 June 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Ratnakar Dash, Mr. S. Thananjayan, Ms. C. Rubavathi, Ms. Promila, Ms. Merline, Ms. Merlyn Rachel, Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Ms. Archana Goswami Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, Mr. Yashu Rustagi, Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Mr. Vinay Singh Bist, Mr. Prateek Khushwaha, Mr. Sahas Bhasin, Mr. Khushal, Mr. Sajal Jain, Ms. Sonakshi Malhan, Mr. Ajith Williyam, Mr. S. Gowthaman, Mr. R. Nedumaran

Relief Sought & Granted

On 10 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Leave granted. 2. Arguments concluded.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 9 Jun 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 9 Jun 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 14 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.