- 21 March 2013. Let the default be made good within three weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. .........................J (DIPAK MISRA) New Delhi;
- 6 October 2016. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed the statement of case, but Ld. Counsel for the respondent has not filed the same. However, filing of Statement of Case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn. L
- 15 July 2019. Ld.counsel for the appellant seeks four week's time to take necessary steps in compliance of order of the court. Opportunity was granted to the appellant to do the needful by the Chamber Judge vide Order dated 01.05.2017 and sufficient time has been granted to the appellant for making due compliance.
- 26 August 2019. Appellant No.4 has been served in alternative arrangement but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Appellant Nos. 1 to 3, 5 and 6 have been not been served in alternative arrangement. Since the appellants are unrepresented, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
- 18 December 2019. Despite on second call, none appear for the parties. As per Office Report, service on appellant Nos.1 to 3 and 5 is incomplete. Let fresh notice be issued to the appellant Nos.1 to 3 and 5.
- 7 February 2020. As prayed, list the matters after four weeks.
- 3 February 2023. Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented. Being complete matter, process the same for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
- 1 April 2024. Respondent nos.1 and 3 have been served with notice of alternative arrangement, but there is no appearance. However, Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Ld. AOR submits that there is change of counsel for State of Haryana -respondent no.1 and further submits that memo of appearance will be filed today and vakalatnama will be filed
- 12 July 2024. Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Service of notice on alternative arrangement is complete on respondent Nos. 2 and 3, there is no appearance.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. L.K. Bhushan, Ms. Raashi Beri, Mr. Mohit Sharma, Mr. Rajan Narain, Ms. Kanika Gomber, Mr. Bankey Bihari, Mr. Anip Sachthey, Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Mr. Umang Shankar, Mr. Harsh Trivedi, Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Ms. Mahima Benipuri Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Mr. Mohit Sharma, Mr. Vishal, Mr. Anmol Jassal, Dr. Monika Gusain, Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Ms. Himanshi Shakya, Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Mr. Samyak Jain
