LALITKUMAR JIVABHAI THAKKAR AND ANR. III-B [P-2] Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SUBSTITUTION (C.A. 2647/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2647/2017

Case Record

C.A. 2647/2017

LALITKUMAR JIVABHAI THAKKAR AND ANR. III-B [P-2] Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SUBSTITUTION

REGISTRAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

29 PDF renditions· 29 distinct judicial orders· 8 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

LALITKUMAR JIVABHAI THAKKAR & ANR. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.. C.A. 2647/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010114662009. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 8 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 17 May 2018 to 4 February 2026.

On 17 May 2018 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 to 6 are duly served/represented. Statement of case has not been filed by the parties and time has expired.
On 16 December 2021 the order records: We are informed by Mr. Nikhil Goel, learned counsel for the appellants that Respondent No.3 has passed away. He is permitted to take steps to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased Respondent No.3. List thereafter.
On 3 March 2023 the order records: Delay condoned. Application for substitution to bring on record legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.3 is allowed.
On 18 July 2023 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of the unserved respondent Nos. 3(i) to 3 (iv). List again on 24.8.2023.
On 24 August 2023 the order records: Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 3(i) to 3(iv). List again on 09.10.2023.
On 9 October 2023 the order records: Respondent nos. 1,4,5 and 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 and 3(i-iv) but none has entered appearance.
On 6 January 2026 the order records: Respondent nos.1, 4 and 6 are duly represented. Service is already complete on respondent no.2 at SLP stage but none has entered appearance.
On 4 February 2026 the order records: Respondent nos.1, 4, 5.1 to 5.5 and 6 are duly represented. Service was complete on respondent no.2 at SLP stage but none has entered appearance.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

17 May 2018. Respondent nos. 1 to 6 are duly served/represented. Statement of case has not been filed by the parties and time has expired.
16 December 2021. We are informed by Mr. Nikhil Goel, learned counsel for the appellants that Respondent No.3 has passed away. He is permitted to take steps to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased Respondent No.3. List thereafter.
3 March 2023. Delay condoned. Application for substitution to bring on record legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.3 is allowed.
18 July 2023. Ld. Counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of the unserved respondent Nos. 3(i) to 3 (iv). List again on 24.8.2023.
24 August 2023. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 3(i) to 3(iv). List again on 09.10.2023.
9 October 2023. Respondent nos. 1,4,5 and 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 and 3(i-iv) but none has entered appearance.
6 January 2026. Respondent nos.1, 4 and 6 are duly represented. Service is already complete on respondent no.2 at SLP stage but none has entered appearance.
4 February 2026. Respondent nos.1, 4, 5.1 to 5.5 and 6 are duly represented. Service was complete on respondent no.2 at SLP stage but none has entered appearance.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh, Ms. Naveen Goel, Mr. Adhitya Koshy Roy, Mr Adithya, Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Ms Saloni Meshram Advocates — Respondents: Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, Mr. Vipin Nair, Mr. Arindam Ghosh, Mr. Vinayak Mishra, Mr. P.b.suresh, Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Mr. Gaurav Vats, Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Mr. Aditya Narendranath, Mr Gaurav Vats, Ms Aishwarya Srivastava

Relief Sought & Granted

On 4 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: Respondent nos.1, 4, 5.1 to 5.5 and 6 are duly represented. Service was complete on respondent no.2 at SLP stage but none has entered appearance.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 4 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 4 Feb 2026

Next hearing

6 Jan 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 8 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 16 other files in the folder were left out.