L. A. SRINIVASA GUPTA Versus R. MANJUNATHA REDDY AND ORS. ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G. (C.A. 2162/2020)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2162/2020

Case Record

C.A. 2162/2020

L. A. SRINIVASA GUPTA Versus R. MANJUNATHA REDDY AND ORS. ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Delay

20 PDF renditions· 20 distinct judicial orders· 20 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

L.A. SRINIVASA GUPTA Versus R. MANJUNATHA REDDY & ORS.. C.A. 2162/2020 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010367332017. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 20 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 February 2019 to 24 March 2026.

On 4 February 2019 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, list the matter after two weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR-CUM-PS
On 19 July 2019 the order records: Since the petition for review is still pending before the Karnataka High Court, we adjourn the hearing of the special leave petition by a period of eight weeks from today. The parties shall cooperate with the High Court in the early listing and hearing of the review petition. List the special leave petition on 21 Octob
On 20 January 2020 the order records: A letter has been circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the review petition has been delivered. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks an adjournment to enable him to file a Special Leave Petition against the decision in review.
On 13 October 2020 the order records: Both matters Service is complete on respondent nos. 7(1) and 8 but none has entered appearance. Await service report in respect of respondent no.5.
On 21 January 2021 the order records: Both matters Delay in filing fresh address of respondent Nos.1 to 3, 6 and 7(2) is condoned. Notice be issued immediately. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit of dasti service within four weeks.
On 25 February 2021 the order records: Both matters As per office report, ld. counsel for the appellant has to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 3, 6 and 7(2) and also fresh address in respect of respondent no.4. Ld. counsel for the appellant pointed out that the respondent nos. 1 to 3, 6 and 7(2) were very much available an
On 8 April 2021 the order records: Both matters Service is complete on respondent nos. 5,7(1), 7(2) and 8 but none has entered appearance. Service is complete on respondent no.2 but not complete on respondent nos. 1 and 3. Ld. Advocate-on-record, Mr Anantha Narayana M.G appears for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and seeks time for filing vakalatnama. Be filed w
On 24 March 2026 the order records: No case to entertain the applications for early hearing is made out. The same are, accordingly, dismissed.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 February 2019. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, list the matter after two weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR-CUM-PS
22 February 2019. Since a review petition has been filed before the High Court, list the Special Leave Petition on 29 March (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR-CUM-PS
29 March 2019. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the Review petition before the High Court is now listed. List the special leave petition on 3 May 2019.
3 May 2019. Since the Review Petition has been posted for hearing before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore after the ensuing recess, list the matter on 19 July, 2019.
19 July 2019. Since the petition for review is still pending before the Karnataka High Court, we adjourn the hearing of the special leave petition by a period of eight weeks from today. The parties shall cooperate with the High Court in the early listing and hearing of the review petition. List the special leave petition on 21 Octob
18 November 2019. The Court has been apprised of the fact that the High Court of Karnataka has reserved its judgment in the review petition. List the Special Leave Petition on 9 December 2019.
9 December 2019. The review petition is stated to have been dismissed by the High Court of Karnataka. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner shall place a copy of the order of the High Court on record. List in the second week of January, 2020.
20 January 2020. A letter has been circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the review petition has been delivered. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks an adjournment to enable him to file a Special Leave Petition against the decision in review.
20 February 2020. The Special Leave Petition against the order of the Karnataka High Court in review is stated to have been filed and is numbered as Diary No 6959 of 2020. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the defects would be cured within a period of two weeks from today. List the Special Leave Petition
16 March 2020. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
22 July 2020. Both matters Await certificate of service in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 8 (common in both the matters) from the High Court. Reminder be issued.
26 August 2020. Both matters Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 8. Issue D.O. letter. Registry to inform telephonically as well. List again on 13.10.2020.
13 October 2020. Both matters Service is complete on respondent nos. 7(1) and 8 but none has entered appearance. Await service report in respect of respondent no.5.
21 January 2021. Both matters Delay in filing fresh address of respondent Nos.1 to 3, 6 and 7(2) is condoned. Notice be issued immediately. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit of dasti service within four weeks.
25 February 2021. Both matters As per office report, ld. counsel for the appellant has to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 3, 6 and 7(2) and also fresh address in respect of respondent no.4. Ld. counsel for the appellant pointed out that the respondent nos. 1 to 3, 6 and 7(2) were very much available an
8 April 2021. Both matters Service is complete on respondent nos. 5,7(1), 7(2) and 8 but none has entered appearance. Service is complete on respondent no.2 but not complete on respondent nos. 1 and 3. Ld. Advocate-on-record, Mr Anantha Narayana M.G appears for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and seeks time for filing vakalatnama. Be filed w
14 July 2021. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file the affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent nos. 1, 3, 4 and 6.
23 August 2021. Both matters Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are duly represented. Service is complete on the remaining respondents but none has entered appearance.
28 January 2025. Upon being mentioned by the appellant, list in the fourth week of April, 2025.
24 March 2026. No case to entertain the applications for early hearing is made out. The same are, accordingly, dismissed.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. A. Karthik, Mr. Kashi Vishweshwar, Ms. Kajal Bhatia, Mr. V. Lakshminarayana, Mr. Kashi Vishwanath, Mr. Darpan K.M., Mr. Ashwini G. Raj, Mr. Hetu Arora Sethi, Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Ms. Amita Sharma, Ms. Rudali Patil, Ms. Amrita Sharma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ankit Verma, Mr. Tarun Gulia, Mr. V.C. Shukla, Mr. Ananth Mohan Rao, Mr. Anantha Narayana M.G., Mr. Anantha Narayana M.g., Mr. Vikash Chandra Shukla, Mr. Siddharth Relan, Mr. Lakshya S. Pandey, Ms. Isha Barshiliya, Mr. Sanchit Garga, Mr. Kunal Rana

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 March 2026 the latest order on this record says: No case to entertain the applications for early hearing is made out. The same are, accordingly, dismissed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 24 Mar 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Mar 2026

Next hearing

24 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 20 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.