- 24 July 2015. File not received. List the matter again on 01.10.2015.
- 1 October 2015. The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn. (M K HANJURA) Signature Not Verified Registrar SB Digitally signed by Sushma K
- 4 May 2018. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Parties are directed to maintain status-quo in the matter.
- 8 October 2018. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned subject to deposit of cost of Rs.2,000/- with the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Welfare Trust within four weeks. Subject to deposit of costs as aforesaid, application for setting aside abatement and application for substitution to bring on record Lr of deceas
- 8 February 2019. List this application along with the civil appeal on a non miscellaneous day after two weeks.
- 19 January 2023. On the anvil of the hearing, we are informed that the parties are in the process of mutually resolving the dispute. If it is so, it is time that the issue receives a quietus one way or the other.
- 14 February 2023. IA No. 29191/2023 is disposed of and appeal qua legal representatives of respondent No. 1 and respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall stand disposed of. IA No. 29194/2023 for correction in the names is allowed.
- 10 April 2023. Learned counsel for both the parties state that talks of settlement are at advanced stage and four weeks' time may be granted for the said purpose. List for directions in miscellaneous matters to report on settlement in the miscellaneous week prior to ensuing summer vacation.
- 18 May 2023. In pursuance to the adjournment letter circulated on behalf of the petitioner the matter is adjourned for one week, as prayed.
- 28 October 2025. The applications for substitution for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased sole appellant, condonation of delay in filing setting aside of abatement and setting aside of abatement are allowed. 2. However, a dispute has been raised by learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 3 that Kunta Devi and Kunti Devi may
- 20 January 2026. After some arguments, as prayed for by learned counsel for the respondents, list the matter tomorrow i.e., 21.01.2026.
- 21 January 2026. At the outset, learned counsel for the contesting respondents no. 2 and 3 submits that they are ready to settle the matter in terms of the offer made by the petitioner to them. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that time may be given to finally seal the deal.
- 18 February 2026. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that pursuant to the liberty given by this Court on the last occasion, despite the appellants being ready to settle the matter after giving up 50% of their claim on the land(s) belonging to their father, still the other side has not accepted the same. 2. At th
- 26 February 2026. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the parties had arrived at a settlement and the same has been signed by all of them except for respondent no.2, who is in Army and presently posted in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Thus, time was sought to get the agreement signed by him also. 2. Learn
- 20 March 2026. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled the matter and a joint petition has also been filed. However, in view of the parties not being able to join the proceedings either physically, or virtually today, as jointly prayed for, list on 2. Interim order to continue till the next date of listin
- 6 April 2026. Though we could have left the parties to their fate as in the compromise agreement, the main exercise of actual demarcation by metes and bounds on the ground is proposed to be done; however, for doing complete justice, we adjourn the matter for four weeks. 2. Let the same be done and the parties revert to us bringing o
- 25 May 2026. The matter could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order passed by this Court on 04.05.2018 to continue till the next date of listing.
- 10 August 2026. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the signed order.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Bimal Roy Jad, Ms. Shikha Dixit, Mr. N.G. Dev, Dr. Brij Bhushan K. Jauhari, Dr. Nilakshi Choudhry, Mr. Atul Mahan, Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Mrs. Murnal Chawdhery, Mr. Harsh Mahan, Mr. Aman Garg, Dr. Brij Bhushan, Ms. Riddhi Jad Advocates — Respondents: Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Mr. Gaurav Goel, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Neha Agarwal, Ms. Prasi Tyagi, Mr. Siddhant Sahai, Mr. T.N. Singh, Mr. Vikas Kumar Singh, Ms. Rajshree Singh, Mr. Vikram Singh, Mr. Sham Chand, Mr. Siddhant Sahay
