- 6 December 2024. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Application to appear and argue in person is allowed.
- 14 February 2025. 1) The amount of maintenance is due. The petitioner appearing in person claims it as Rs.16,00,000/-(Rupees Sixteen Lakhs); however, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent has not made any statement thereon. 2) In terms of the orders passed on grant of maintenance by the Court below, the arrears be cleared by
- 21 May 2025. 1) The matter may not be deleted from the List of 18 th July, 2025. 2) However, as requested by the petitioner, she is permitted to file the correct translations of the documents.
- 18 July 2025. 1. The petitioner-in-person, on being asked about legal assistance either through Supreme Court Legal Services Committee or by appointing an amicus curiae, refused the same. Therefore, she is permitted to argue in-person. 2. Order dated 14.02.2025 passed by this Court has not been complied with. An affidavit has been f
- 31 October 2025. 1) The petitioner appearing in person submits that the entire arrears have not yet been paid and Rs.38,334/- still remain. 2) On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent submits that the total amount has been paid and he wishes to show receipts.
- 24 November 2025. 1. After hearing learned petitioner-in-person and learned counsel for the respondents, we find that there is deficiency in payment of maintenance of Rs.30,000/-. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has already paid the amounts of Rs.25,000/- and Rs. 20,000/- in two tranches on different dates, indicating
- 8 December 2025. 1. List on 13.01.2026. 2. Parties to appear in person on the next date.
- 13 January 2026. 1. Petitioner-in-person is present. Respondent is also present along with his counsel. 2. Petitioner has filed some affidavit which is not on record.
- 3 February 2026. 1. Leave granted. 2. List in due course.
- 27 May 2026. Petitioner-in-person is present. Respondent nos. 1 to 4 are duly represented. Service of NLPA is complete.
- 5 August 2026. Petitioner-in-person is present. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 are duly represented.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Mr. Shivansh Bharatkumar Pandya, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Ms. Aditi Agarwal, Ms. Aarushi S. Desai, Mr. Mohammad Zulfikar Lokdawala, Mr. Vishal Kumar Yadav, Mr. Mohammad Zulfikar Lakdamala, Ms. Apoorva Anand, Ms. Swapnil Singh, Ms. Somya Tyagi, Mr. Pururaj Aggarwal
