- 27 January 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the direction to the effect that though the respondent(s)/plaintiff(s) is/are directed to pay stamp duty on the lease deed and lease agreement shall be exempted from payment of any penalty is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in the case of Gangappa and Anothe
- 22 April 2025. Four weeks' time is granted to the respondent No. 1 to file counter affidavit. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 2 and 5, there is no appearance on their behalf.
- 18 July 2025. Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos.2 and 5.
- 18 August 2025. List the special leave petition itself along with all the applications on 12.09.2025.
- 12 September 2025. List after ensuing Dussehra holidays.
- 10 March 2026. Adjournment is sought, by way of a letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondents, on the ground that the learned arguing counsel is indisposed. Accepting the request, the matter is adjourned.
- 17 March 2026. Overseas Bank, Bengaluru, is allowed and the said party is brought on record as respondent No. 7. Cause title may be amended accordingly.
- 19 March 2026. Re-list on 23.03.2026. In the meanwhile, Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 shall get instructions on certain aspects put to him in relation to the order to be passed in this case.
- 23 March 2026. 1. A suit for partition and recovery of mesne profits filed in the year 2008 stands unresolved due to the issue of insufficient stamp dut y on two documents produced in evidence. The Trial Court rejected two applications filed by the 1st defendant to reject certain documents as inadmissible in evidence and impound thos
- 23 March 2026. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 1 states, on instructions, that respondent No. 1, Bhagwandas Sharma, would not be in a position to pay twice the penalty, to settle the issue at this stage.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Ayush Negi, Ms. Vishakha Upadhyaya, Ms. Aarushi Gupta, Mrs. Vishakha Upadhyay, Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Mr. Chaitanya Pandey, Mrs. Vishakha Upadhyaya, Mr. Abhishek Singh Bhandari, Mr. Rose Verma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Ms. Anisha Chandrakumar, Ms. Kanishka Singh, Mr. Ravi Prakash, Mr. Chandra Prakash, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. C.P. Rajwar, Mr. Abhishek Chaterjee, Mr. Krishan Kumar, Mr. C.p. Rajwar, Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Aindri Saha
