KIKIBEN AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ITEM ] (C.A. 13473/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 13473/2024

Case Record

C.A. 13473/2024

KIKIBEN AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ITEM ]

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA · HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Delay

17 PDF renditions· 17 distinct judicial orders· 17 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

KIKIBEN & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.. C.A. 13473/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010371502018. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 17 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 16 November 2018 to 17 August 2026.

On 16 November 2018 the order records: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the High Court has erroneously applied Section 6 (3-B) of the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 instead of Section 6 (3C) of the Act. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the application for condonation of delay.
On 29 January 2019 the order records: The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent No.1 within two weeks. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
On 15 March 2019 the order records: Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
On 30 April 2019 the order records: Last opportunity is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
On 31 October 2023 the order records: The Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to file additional affidavit. Permission sought for is granted. List on 04.01.2024.
On 6 August 2024 the order records: 1. IA No. 422 of 2024 (i.e., Application for permission to raise additional questions of law and grounds) is filed by the petitioner(s). 2. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) seeks two weeks' time to file objections/reply to the aforesaid application.
On 27 November 2024 the order records: Leave granted. List in the month of January, 2025.
On 17 August 2026 the order records: IA No. 117117/2026 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI DILEEP KUMAR) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

16 November 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the High Court has erroneously applied Section 6 (3-B) of the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 instead of Section 6 (3C) of the Act. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the application for condonation of delay.
16 January 2019. Await service/track report in respect of respondent Nos.1 and 2. List again on 29.1.2019.
29 January 2019. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent No.1 within two weeks. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
15 March 2019. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
30 April 2019. Last opportunity is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
7 August 2023. List on 22.08.2023.
22 August 2023. List next week.
25 August 2023. List the matter on 05.09.2023.
5 September 2023. List on 03.10.2023.
3 October 2023. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
31 October 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to file additional affidavit. Permission sought for is granted. List on 04.01.2024.
4 January 2024. List on 27.02.2024.
14 May 2024. List on 06.08.2024.
6 August 2024. 1. IA No. 422 of 2024 (i.e., Application for permission to raise additional questions of law and grounds) is filed by the petitioner(s). 2. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) seeks two weeks' time to file objections/reply to the aforesaid application.
21 November 2024. List on 27.11.2024. (GEETA JOSHI) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
27 November 2024. Leave granted. List in the month of January, 2025.
17 August 2026. IA No. 117117/2026 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI DILEEP KUMAR) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Mr. K.K. Trivedi, Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Ms. Neha Sangwan, Ms. Mahima C. Shroff, Mrs. Mahima C. Shroff, Ms. Monisha Suri, Mr. Kk Trivedi, Mr. K. K. Trivedi, Ms. Salonee Paranjpe, Mr. Dhananjay Kataria, Mr. Anoop Raj Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Giss Antony, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Mr. Kanu Agrwal

Relief Sought & Granted

On 17 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: IA No. 117117/2026 No case to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI DILEEP KUMAR) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 17 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 17 Aug 2026

Next hearing

17 Aug 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 17 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.