KASHINATH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. III [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6] Versus BRIJLAL LALAJI SANGLANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT (C.A. 3585/2010)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3585/2010

Case Record

C.A. 3585/2010

KASHINATH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. III [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6] Versus BRIJLAL LALAJI SANGLANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT

SH. APOORV SINGH

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

38 PDF renditions· 38 distinct judicial orders· 27 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

KASHINATH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. Versus BRIJLAL LALAJI SANGLANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.. C.A. 3585/2010 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010130042009. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 27 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 15 December 2010 to 21 August 2026.

On 15 December 2010 the order records: Registry has to verify that why appeal of the year 2010 is listed for filing of statement of case. Statement of case may be filed before 17.2.2011.
On 15 September 2014 the order records: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the chamber summons served upon the proposed legal representatives of the deceased respondents.
On 17 February 2021 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10 to 12 are duly represented. Statement of case may be filed, if so desired.
On 24 November 2021 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10 to 12 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 8(i) to 8(iii), 9(i), 9(iv) to 9(vi) but none has entered appearance.
On 27 September 2024 the order records: Respondent Nos.2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1, 9.3 to 9.6 and 10 to 12 are duly represented. Earlier Ld. counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 7 has been designated as Senior Advocate. Service of alternative arrangement notice in respect of the above respondents is still awaited.
On 2 January 2025 the order records: Respondent Nos. 2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1, 9.3 to 9.6, 10 to 12 are duly represented. Service of notice of alternative arrangement is not complete in respect of Respondent Nos. 1 and 7, hence two weeks time is granted to Ld. Counsel for the appellant to file fresh particulars for issuance of notice of alternative arrange
On 20 July 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1 and 9.3 to 9.6 & 10 to 12 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps with regard to deceased respondent Nos.1 and 7 within two weeks.
On 21 August 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos. 2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1 and 9.3 to 9.6 & 10 to 12 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps with regard to deceased respondent Nos. 1 & 7 within two weeks as last opportunity. If steps are taken as above, process the same as per rules, else apprise the same before the

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

15 December 2010. Registry has to verify that why appeal of the year 2010 is listed for filing of statement of case. Statement of case may be filed before 17.2.2011.
1 April 2011. File not received. Reasons be spelt out for this lapse.
1 April 2011. File not received. Reasons be spelt out for this lapse.
13 April 2011. None appears. Learned counsel for the appellant shall be directed to file the statement of case within a period of 45 days whereafter a copy of the same shall be provided by him to the learned counsel for the respondents against proper acknowledgment and the learned counsel for the respondents shall file the statement
28 September 2012. Counsel for the appellants submitted that statement of case on behalf of the appellants has already been filed. Office to check and verify. If the statement of case has been filed, the same be taken on record. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) | |
13 February 2013. By way of last opportunity, six weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the petitioners to bring on record the death certificate of respondent no.9. The remaining respondents to file their statement of case within six weeks.
12 August 2013. Three weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the parties to comply with office report dated 25.04.2013. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] | |
6 September 2013. The prayer made in the I.A. is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to bring on record the L.Rs of deceased Respondent No.9. Learned counsel for the petitioners is granted a week's time to file amended memo of parties.
15 September 2014. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the chamber summons served upon the proposed legal representatives of the deceased respondents.
11 November 2014. The matter falls under the complete category. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
21 October 2019. As the impleadment application is not opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant(s), application for impleadment is allowed, as prayed. Registry to process the matter further.
17 February 2021. Respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10 to 12 are duly represented. Statement of case may be filed, if so desired.
25 March 2021. Respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10 to 12 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 8(i) to 8(iii), 9(i) and 9(iv) to 9(vi) but none has entered appearance.
16 August 2021. Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks four weeks time for taking appropriate steps/fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars in respect of respondent no.9(ii)(dead) and respondent no.9(iii). Granted. Remaining respondents are served/duly represented.
29 September 2021. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for taking appropriate steps in respect of respondent no.9(ii)(dead). Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars to effect service on respondent no.9(iii) within two weeks time, as last opportunity.
24 November 2021. Respondent nos. 1 to 7 and 10 to 12 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 8(i) to 8(iii), 9(i), 9(iv) to 9(vi) but none has entered appearance.
17 October 2022. The time of six weeks is granted to furnish fresh particulars in respect of deceased respondent No. 9(iii). Despite best efforts of the learned counsel has not been able to procure particulars in respect of respondent No. 9(iii).It is informed that respondent 9(iii) had got married. The respondent No. 9(iii) shall be s
18 July 2023. 1. Office report dated 08th July, 2023 indicates that service is in-complete on respondent no. 9(iii). Certificate of service of the Notice of Lodgment of the Petition of Appeal is awaited. 2. In the meantime, Registry is directed to address a communication to the concerned High Court seeking the status of service of N
6 February 2024. 1. As prayed for, by way of last and final opportunity, learned counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time from today to comply with the earlier orders passed by this Court commencing from 2. Needful be done, failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution qua respondent no. 9(ii) witho
20 March 2024. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants. 2. In view of the office report dated 20 th March, 2024, as prayed for, by the learned counsel for the appellants, two weeks time is granted remove the defects in the application (I.A. D. No. 56725 of 2024) filed for the substitution of legal heirs of deceased respondent no
19 April 2024. Let the notice be issued on all the applications. (SNEHA) (VEENA RANI NAGPAL) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
9 August 2024. Despite service of notice on proposed Lr. Nos. 1 and 4 of deceased Respondent No. 9(ii), there is no appearance. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel for the appellants, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to proposed Lr. Nos. 2 and 3 of deceased Respondent No. 9(ii).
27 September 2024. Respondent Nos.2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1, 9.3 to 9.6 and 10 to 12 are duly represented. Earlier Ld. counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 7 has been designated as Senior Advocate. Service of alternative arrangement notice in respect of the above respondents is still awaited.
2 January 2025. Respondent Nos. 2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1, 9.3 to 9.6, 10 to 12 are duly represented. Service of notice of alternative arrangement is not complete in respect of Respondent Nos. 1 and 7, hence two weeks time is granted to Ld. Counsel for the appellant to file fresh particulars for issuance of notice of alternative arrange
2 April 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted four weeks' time to take steps for service of notice on unserved respondents.
20 July 2026. Respondent Nos.2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1 and 9.3 to 9.6 & 10 to 12 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps with regard to deceased respondent Nos.1 and 7 within two weeks.
21 August 2026. Respondent Nos. 2 to 6, 8.1 to 8.3, 9.1 and 9.3 to 9.6 & 10 to 12 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps with regard to deceased respondent Nos. 1 & 7 within two weeks as last opportunity. If steps are taken as above, process the same as per rules, else apprise the same before the
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, Mr. Sunil Kumar, Mr. Manish Pitale, Mr. Wasi Haider, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Mr Satyajit, Mr Satya Kam Sharma, Mr Siddharth Gautam, Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Mr. Siddharth N. Tirthkar, Mr. Vijay Raj Singh Chauhan Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Mr. Kishor Ram Lambat, Mr. Sunil Kumar Sethi, Mr. Sachin Pahwa, Mr. Harvinder Singh Maan, Mr. R. S. Mishra, Mr. Naeem Ilyas, Mr. Subasin Sethi, Mr. Kishor Lambat, Ms. Kashmira Lambat, Ms. Suja Joshi, Mr. Prem Mankani

Relief Sought & Granted

On 6 February 2024 the order records: Needful be done, failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution qua respondent no.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 21 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 21 Aug 2026

Next hearing

25 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 27 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 9 other files in the folder were left out.