KALABURAGI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus ALEEMUDDIN PATEL AND ORS. (C.A. 11754/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 11754/2025

Case Record

C.A. 11754/2025

KALABURAGI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus ALEEMUDDIN PATEL AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

27 PDF renditions· 27 distinct judicial orders· 11 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

KALABURAGI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus ALEEMUDDIN PATEL & ORS.. C.A. 11754/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010337382023. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 11 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 1 September 2023 to 19 November 2025.

On 1 September 2023 the order records: Issue notice on the special leave petition as also on the prayer for interim relief, returnable in six weeks.
On 20 October 2023 the order records: Despite due service on respondent nos.2 to 4, there is no appearance. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that the counter affidavit would be filed on behalf of said respondent within a day of two. Two days time, is granted for the said purpose.
On 31 October 2023 the order records: Despite due service on respondent no.4, there is no appearance. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that counter affidavit has been filed today morning on behalf of said respondent. Office to verify.
On 12 November 2024 the order records: The matter should not be deleted from the notified date i.e. (DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) DY. REGISTRAR
On 25 July 2025 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 in SLP(C) No. 11077-11078/2017 seeking adjournment, re-list the matter on 01.09.2025.
On 1 September 2025 the order records: impleadement are allowed. Amended memo of parties shall be filed within a period of one week from today.
On 19 November 2025 the order records: Learned counsel appearing for both parties seek an adjournment, albeit on different grounds. Accepting the requests, the matter is adjourned.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

1 September 2023. Issue notice on the special leave petition as also on the prayer for interim relief, returnable in six weeks.
20 October 2023. Despite due service on respondent nos.2 to 4, there is no appearance. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that the counter affidavit would be filed on behalf of said respondent within a day of two. Two days time, is granted for the said purpose.
31 October 2023. Despite due service on respondent no.4, there is no appearance. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that counter affidavit has been filed today morning on behalf of said respondent. Office to verify.
1 February 2024. Let the matters be not deleted from the notified date i.e.
17 May 2024. List on 26.07.2024.
12 November 2024. The matter should not be deleted from the notified date i.e. (DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) DY. REGISTRAR
3 March 2025. Tag with Civil Appeal Nos. 767-768/2017.
25 July 2025. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 in SLP(C) No. 11077-11078/2017 seeking adjournment, re-list the matter on 01.09.2025.
1 September 2025. impleadement are allowed. Amended memo of parties shall be filed within a period of one week from today.
15 October 2025. Re-list on 19.11.2025. (DEEPAK GUGLANI) (PREETI SAXENA) AR-cum-PS
19 November 2025. Learned counsel appearing for both parties seek an adjournment, albeit on different grounds. Accepting the requests, the matter is adjourned.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Kiran Suri, Mr. S.j. Amith, Ms. Aishwarya Kumar, Ms. Vidushi Garg, Dr. Mrs. Vipin Gupta, Mr. S. J. Amith, Ms. Rukhsana Choudhury, Ms. Shumaila, Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Ankur Saigal, Mr. Ankit Parhar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Preetam Shah, Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Mr. D. L. Chidananda, Mr. Dhanajay Kumar, Mr. Ishan Roy Choudhary, Mr. Ramakrishna Viraraghavan, Mrs. Geeta Rani, Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Mr. Abhishekh Singh, Mr. Shivraj Singh

Relief Sought & Granted

On 19 November 2025 the latest order on this record says: Learned counsel appearing for both parties seek an adjournment, albeit on different grounds. Accepting the requests, the matter is adjourned.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 19 Nov 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 19 Nov 2025

Next hearing

15 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 11 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 12 other files in the folder were left out.