- 20 July 2018. As prayed, list after eight weeks.
- 17 September 2018. Three months' time is granted to report compliance. List thereafter, (Jagdish Chander) (Sarita Purohit) Branch Officer AR-cum-PS
- 21 January 2019. Perused the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeking adjournment. To report compliance, ten weeks' time is granted.
- 26 April 2019. As prayed, fifteen days' time is granted to file further affidavit. List thereafter.
- 4 July 2019. Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment due to personal difficulty. List next week.
- 12 July 2019. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, learned Additional Solicitor General, has fairly submitted that though substantial compliance has been made, still some compliance is required to be done. The learned ASG prays for two months' time to report compliance.
- 3 October 2019. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we find that substantial compliance has been made. There are some legal representatives who have to be ascertained and the payments have to be made to them. Let the needful be done and the full compliance report be submitted to this Court.
- 18 November 2019. Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment for filing objections to the compliance report. Let the needful be done within three weeks.
- 13 December 2019. Perused the letter circulated by M/s. J.s. Wad & Co., on behalf of the petitioner(s)/respondent(s) seeking adjournment. List after four weeks.
- 18 November 2021. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter stands adjourned. Be listed after four weeks.
- 17 December 2021. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter stands adjourned. Be listed after four weeks, as prayed.
- 28 February 2022. On the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we adjourn the matter today, though reluctantly, as the matter has already been adjourned several times in the past. List these matters on 21st March, 2022.
- 21 March 2022. M.A. No. 1807 of 2018 Issue notice. Mr. Ashish Wad, learned counsel accepts notice for the respondent.
- 5 July 2023. Shri A.S. Nadkarini, learned senior counsel appearing for the opposite party states that compliance has been effected, however, he requires reasonable time to file appropriate affidavit placing on record the compliance. This Court grants two weeks' time to file the said affidavit. List again on 1st August, 2023.
- 1 August 2023. On the joint request made by the learned counsel for th parties, list these matters on 29th August, 2023.
- 29 August 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, the matters are adjourned for two weeks.
- 16 October 2023. As prayed for, list this matter on 21.11.2023.
- 21 November 2023. List on 12.12.2023. (HEMALATHA MOHAN) (ANJU KAPOOR) P.S. to REGISTRAR
- 12 December 2023. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned s2enior counsel appearing for the respondents, has prayed for one last opportunity to place before the Court final settlement/affidavit of full compliance within eight weeks. As prayed, list the matter on 05.03.2024.
- 5 March 2024. On 12.12.2023, this Court has passed the following order: “Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents, has prayed for one last opportunity to place before the Court final settlement/affidavit of full compliance within eight weeks.
- 19 March 2024. Pursuant to our order dated 05.03.2024, the three officers of Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (for short, 'the Corporation') are present and an additional affidavit dated 17.03.2024 has been filed duly sworn by the present Municipal Commissioner, Shri Iqbal Singh Chahal. From a perusal of the said affidavit it appea
- 23 April 2024. Pursuant to order dated 19.03.2024, the Deputy Commissioner (SWM) and the Chief Engineer (SWM) are present today. List the matters again on 30.04.2024, to be taken up at 10:30 a.m.
- 30 April 2024. Pursuant to orders dated 19.03.2024 and 23.04.2024, the Deputy Commissioner (SWM) and the Chief Engineer(SWM) are present. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents, has submitted in Court a further affidavit of compliance on behalf of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (for short, 'the
- 17 May 2024. Pursuant to order dated 30.04.2024, Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel, submits that an affidavit of compliance dated 17.05.2024 will be filed in the Registry during the course of the day. A true copy of the said affidavit of compliance has been submitted to us and has also been provided to the learned counsel for
- 29 July 2024. In compliance to the last order dated 17th May, 2024 a further affidavit for compliance has been filed by the respondent duly signed by the Deputy Municipal Commissioner (Solid Waste Management) of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation,
- 27 September 2024. Pursuant to the last order, all the Officers as are required today are present in the Court duly represented by their learned Advocate(s)-on-Record and Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel. Further additional affidavit of compliance dated 25 th September, 2024 has been filed duly sworn by the Deputy Municipal Commis
- 20 December 2024. As prayed on behalf of the petitioner(s), list these matters in the first week of February, 2025.
- 19 February 2025. We have gone through the additional affidavit of compliance dated 17.02.2025 filed by the respondents in Contempt Petition. Ms. Rohini Thyagarajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, is granted a week's time to place on record the objections to the said affidavit, which she wanted to submit orally.
- 18 March 2025. Today, we are not passing any order even though we have heard the matter for a substantial period. List these matters on 20.03.2025.
- 20 March 2025. It appears that the order dated 18.03.2025 has shown results. Overnight, the Greater Mumbai Municipal Corporation has come ready with the total payment of Rs.3,09,27,600/- (Rupees Three Crore Nine Lakh Twenty Seven Thousand Six Hundred) under different heads, as provided in the brief note submitted by Mr. Dhruv Mehta,
- The record also contains 7 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Vinay Navare, Ms. Gwen, Ms. Deeplaxmi Matwankar, Dr. Ravindra Chingale, Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Mr. C.U. Singh, Mr. Ashish Wad, Mrs. Jayashree Wad, Mr. Sidhartha Mahajan, Ms. Sukriti Jaggi, Ms. Priti Purandare, Mr. Sidharth Mahajan Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ashish Wad, Mrs. Jayashree Wad, Mr. Sidharth Mahajan, Ms. Sukriti Jaggi, Ms. J. S. Wad, Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Mr. S. S. Rebello, Mr. Ajeyo Sharma, Ms. Tamali Wad, Mrs. Tamali Wad, Mr. Ayush, Mr. Atmaram Ns Nadkarni
