- 2 February 2022. Issue notice. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed.
- 12 April 2022. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent no. Two weeks time, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps, to serve respondent no. 1, as process could not be served with remarks “unclaimed”. In addition, as prayed, dasti be issued at same address.
- 14 July 2022. The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However Mr. Adit Jayeshbhai Shah, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. Goutham Shivshankar , Ld. Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.1. He seeks and is granted four weeks t
- 26 August 2022. The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
- 24 July 2025. Having considered the matter and upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.1/claimant, we deem it appropriate to once again issue notice to respondent no.2, who had chosen not to appear before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(MACT), Madras High Court, and has also failed to appear before t
- 16 September 2025. As prayed for by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 seeking adjournment in terms of letter circulated, four weeks time is granted for filing counter affidavit. 2. List on 28.10.2025.
- 28 October 2025. As prayed for by learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2, seeking adjournment in terms of letter circulated, the matter be listed on 28.01.2026. 2. Interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
- 9 February 2026. Having considered the matter, we deem it appropriate to implead the State of Tamil Nadu through the Director General of Police as respondent no.3. Cause title be amended accordingly. 2. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, learned Advocate on Record, on the request of the Court appears and accepts notice on behalf of the newly im
- 25 March 2026. Heard learned senior counsel for the respondent no.3-State of Tamil Nadu. 2. Pursuant to our earlier order dated 09.02.2026, a personally affirmed affidavit dated 18.03.2026 has been filed by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu. We take strong objection to the statements made by him in paragraphs no.13 and 14 of
- 2 April 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Pursuant to our order dated 25.03.2026, Mr. G.Venkataraman, Director General of Police (DGP), Tamil Nadu, is present and has filed an additional affidavit in which permission is sought from this Court to withdraw certain portions of the earlier affidavit, specifically paragraph
- 30 April 2026. Leave granted. 2. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
- 26 May 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 17 August 2026. Heard learned Senior Counsel/Counsel for the parties. 2. At the outset, Mr. Jayant Mehta, learned Senior Counsel representing the Respondent No.99 (Manipal Cigna Health Insurance) submits that Mr. Joydeep Saha, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Insurance Company has been R.No.66 Go Digit Life Insuran
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Manu Luv Shahalia, Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Mr. Yashvardhan S. Soam, Mr. Manu Shalia, Mr. Manu Shahalia, Mr. Yashvardhan S. Sodhi, Mr. Manu Luv Shalia, Ms. Kiran Bala Agarwal, Mr. Amitava Poddar, Mr. Manu Luv Shalil, Ms. Jyoti, Mr. Manek Sharma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Goutham Shivshankar, Mr. Adit Jayeshbhai Shah, Mr. G. Balaji, Ms. Arzu Paul, Mr. Sharanya, Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, Mr. Veshal Tyagi, Mr. Shiv Kumar, Ms. Vaishnavi, Mr. Vipin Sanghi, Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Ms. Jahnavi Taneja
