K. RAHEJA CORP. PVT LTD. Versus SUNIL PATIL AND ORS. ETC AND ORS. (C.A. 13092/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 13092/2025

Case Record

C.A. 13092/2025

K. RAHEJA CORP. PVT LTD. Versus SUNIL PATIL AND ORS. ETC AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

53 PDF renditions· 53 distinct judicial orders· 20 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

K. RAHEJA CORP. PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.. C.A. 13092/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010010192015. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 20 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 8 August 2017 to 26 May 2026.

On 8 August 2017 the order records: Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the Office Report dated 03.08.2017. (POOJA SEHGAL) (SUMAN JAIN) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
On 8 September 2017 the order records: Service of notice is complete on respondent No.6 in SLP(C) No. 699, 2694 and 2696/2015 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
On 3 November 2017 the order records: Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 7 and 10 in SLP(C) Nos. 699/2015. Respondent No.14 is reported to be dead in SLP(C) Nos.
On 14 December 2017 the order records: Await the return of the service of notice already issued to respondent No. 10 in SLP(C) No.699/2015. Respondent No.14 in SLP(C) Item No.32 2 No. 699/2015 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks, as last chance file an application for substitution to bring on record
On 7 December 2018 the order records: Matters are already ordered to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Hence, Registry to list accordingly. ……..2 ITEM NO.37 -2 As per postal tracking report qua respondent No.1, the remarks indicates that “door locked”. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall, within a period of four weeks, file the fresh particulars of the a
On 25 February 2019 the order records: Fresh particulars of respondent No.1 be furnished within a period of four weeks. There is another application for deletion of respondent Nos.8, 10, 14 and 15. The application is allowed. Respondent Nos.8, 10, 14 and 15 are permitted to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners.
On 27 October 2025 the order records: 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
On 21 May 2026 the order records: 1. Heard learned senior counsel for the parties at length. 2. Hearing concluded.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

8 August 2017. Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the Office Report dated 03.08.2017. (POOJA SEHGAL) (SUMAN JAIN) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
8 September 2017. Service of notice is complete on respondent No.6 in SLP(C) No. 699, 2694 and 2696/2015 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
3 November 2017. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos. 7 and 10 in SLP(C) Nos. 699/2015. Respondent No.14 is reported to be dead in SLP(C) Nos.
14 December 2017. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to respondent No. 10 in SLP(C) No.699/2015. Respondent No.14 in SLP(C) Item No.32 2 No. 699/2015 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks, as last chance file an application for substitution to bring on record
11 April 2018. Files not received. List again on 2.5.2018.
7 December 2018. Matters are already ordered to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Hence, Registry to list accordingly. ……..2 ITEM NO.37 -2 As per postal tracking report qua respondent No.1, the remarks indicates that “door locked”. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall, within a period of four weeks, file the fresh particulars of the a
25 February 2019. Fresh particulars of respondent No.1 be furnished within a period of four weeks. There is another application for deletion of respondent Nos.8, 10, 14 and 15. The application is allowed. Respondent Nos.8, 10, 14 and 15 are permitted to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioners.
25 November 2019. On the oral prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, the name of respondent No.1 in SLP (C) No. 698/2015 is ordered to be deleted at the risk of the petitioner.
13 December 2019. Being complete matters, place the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
20 February 2023. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
21 March 2023. 1 List the Petitions on 02 May 2023.
2 May 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, list the Petitions on 1 August 2023.
10 October 2025. List on 27.10.2025.
27 October 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
22 April 2026. List on 06.05.2026.
14 May 2026. List on 20.05.2026 as first item.
20 May 2026. Arguments heard, which remained inconclusive. For further arguments, list tomorrow i.e., on 21.05.2026 as a part-heard matter.
21 May 2026. 1. Heard learned senior counsel for the parties at length. 2. Hearing concluded.
26 May 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
26 May 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Mr. A. S. Bhasme, Mr. Siddharth Singla, Ms. Neha Agarwal, Ms. Swikriti Singhania, Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Ms. Neha Aggarwal, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Shyam Divan, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Ankur Saigal Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Pankaj Mishra, Mr. A. S. Bhasme, Ms. Shubhangi Tuli, Dr. Ravindra Chingale, Mr. D.S. Matwankar, Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Mr. Gwen Karthika, Mr. Amit B. Thorat, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Mrs. Shubhangi Tuli

Relief Sought & Granted

On 21 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Heard learned senior counsel for the parties at length. 2. Hearing concluded.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 26 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 26 May 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 20 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 14 other files in the folder were left out.