- 3 January 2024. Application seeking exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment is allowed. Delay condoned. However, the question of entitlement of the petitioners to get interest during the period of delay, in case the enhancement of compensation ultimately is granted, will be decided later.
- 31 July 2024. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 18 August 2025. 1. As per Office Report dated 14.08.2025, service upon respondent nos.1 and 4 is complete, but, none has chosen to enter appearance on their behalf. Further, respondent nos.2 and 3 could not be served for want of correct and complete address. 2. Let fresh steps for service be taken in accordance with law, within a peri
- 6 October 2025. As prayed for, list on 03.11.2025.
- 3 November 2025. 1. As per office report respondent No.1-Narayan Prasad Yadav,owner of the vehicle stands served. None has chosen to enter appearance. As such, we appoint Ms. Shalini Tripathi, learned counsel (E-mail id:joshishalini93@gmail.com and Enrol No.-D/14231-A/2022), who is present in Court, as amicus curiae(pro bono), to assis
- 18 November 2025. 1. We notice that the petitioner's claim pertains to the year 2004. In an appeal preferred by the claimant, the High Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal for consideration afresh. 2. In our considered view, the issue could have been decided by the High Court itself. Before we pass the order, we direct that the rec
- 27 November 2025. Post on 04.12.2025 (as item no.1).
- 4 December 2025. 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Arguments concluded.
- 20 March 2026. SANJAY KAROL Leave Granted. 2. The short question that arises for our consideration in this appeal is whether remand to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal1, by the High Court 2, on the question of liability, was justified, after the matter had remained pending before it for 1 Fast Trach Court-I cum Motor Accident Claim
- 20 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 3 August 2026. 1. Appeal is disposed of in terms of signed order. 2. Pending application(s), if any,shall also stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr. Shivam Sharma, Mr. Akash Kumar, Mr. Harsh Tomar, Mr. Kumar Shankaram, Ms. Arpita Gupta, Ms. Nidhi Rana, Mrs. Gurvinder Kaur, Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Mr. Aaditya, Mr. Mr Mahender Rathour, Mr. Anshuman Gupta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Abhishek Gola, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Nikhil Jain, Ms. Divya Jain, Mr. Anshul Mehral, Ms. Shalini Tripathi, Ms. Arveen Sekhon, Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol
