JC-126082A, EX-SUBEDAR MAJOR AND HONORARY XVII LIEUTENANT, K. KRISHNAN NAIR VENUGOPALAN (NAME CHANGED AS VENUGOPALAN P.) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT (C.A. 3324/2019)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3324/2019

Case Record

C.A. 3324/2019

JC-126082A, EX-SUBEDAR MAJOR AND HONORARY XVII LIEUTENANT, K. KRISHNAN NAIR VENUGOPALAN (NAME CHANGED AS VENUGOPALAN P.) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

9 PDF renditions· 9 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

JC-126082A, EX-SUBEDAR MAJOR AND HONORARY LIEUTENANT, K. KRISHNAN NAIR VENUGOPALAN (NAME CHANGED AS VENUGOPALAN P.) Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. C.A. 3324/2019 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010478102018. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 25 March 2019 to 28 April 2026.

On 25 March 2019 the order records: Leave to appeal granted. Delay condoned.
On 11 July 2019 the order records: Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh and complete address of respondent No.5 within two weeks.
On 18 October 2019 the order records: Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 but none has entered appearance. Spare copies have been filed but fresh and complete address of respondent No.5 has not been furnished. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish the fresh and complete address of respondent No.5 within two weeks, as last opportunity.
On 18 February 2020 the order records: Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the Appellant to file fresh particulars of Respondent No.5. List after two weeks.
On 26 October 2020 the order records: Mr. Sachin Sharma, advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, advocate-on-record for the respondents including respondent no. 5. Registry to verify and process the matter accordingly.
On 17 February 2026 the order records: 1. The learned counsel for the respondents prays for time to produce the original records of the Appellate Medical Review Board. 2. List this matter on 16.03.2026.
On 16 March 2026 the order records: 1. At the request of learned counsel for the appellant , list this matter on 07.04.2026.
On 28 April 2026 the order records: 1. The appeal(s) is/are allowed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

25 March 2019. Leave to appeal granted. Delay condoned.
11 July 2019. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh and complete address of respondent No.5 within two weeks.
18 October 2019. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 but none has entered appearance. Spare copies have been filed but fresh and complete address of respondent No.5 has not been furnished. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish the fresh and complete address of respondent No.5 within two weeks, as last opportunity.
18 February 2020. Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the Appellant to file fresh particulars of Respondent No.5. List after two weeks.
26 October 2020. Mr. Sachin Sharma, advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, advocate-on-record for the respondents including respondent no. 5. Registry to verify and process the matter accordingly.
9 February 2026. 1. List on 17.02.2026.
17 February 2026. 1. The learned counsel for the respondents prays for time to produce the original records of the Appellate Medical Review Board. 2. List this matter on 16.03.2026.
16 March 2026. 1. At the request of learned counsel for the appellant , list this matter on 07.04.2026.
28 April 2026. 1. The appeal(s) is/are allowed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Shaijan C. George, Mr. James P. Thomas, Mr. Ravi Sagar, Ms. Glorina George, Mr. Stanislas Tirkey, Mr. Bibin John Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sachin Sharma, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Mr. Prashant Singh Ii, Mr. Mohan Prasad Gupta

Relief Sought & Granted

On 28 April 2026 the order records: The appeal(s) is/are allowed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 28 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 28 Apr 2026

Final disposition

The appeal(s) is/are allowed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.