JAYKANT II-E ASSOCIATES Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ITEM] (Crl.A. 1392/2026)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · Crl.A. 1392/2026

Case Record

Crl.A. 1392/2026

JAYKANT II-E ASSOCIATES Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ITEM]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

Crl.A.Quashing order Criminal appeals Delay

11 PDF renditions· 11 distinct judicial orders· 11 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

JAYKANT Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Crl.A. 1392/2026 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010106682025. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 11 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 3 March 2025 to 24 July 2026.

On 3 March 2025 the order records: 1. The delay of 41 days in filing the present petition is adequately explained and is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 54808/2025 is allowed.
On 21 May 2025 the order records: Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e., 23.05.2025. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
On 23 May 2025 the order records: 1. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.03.2025, the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees five lakhs). 2. List the matter after the partial Court working days are over for hearing on the quantum of sentence.
On 11 August 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees five lakhs), as directed by this Court vide order dated 03.03.2025 inasmuch as he wants to compensate the family of the victim instead of undergoing the whole sentence.
On 16 December 2025 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a position to make a further deposit of Rs.7,00,000/- as directed by the order of this Court on 11.08.2025. 2. He wants to take instructions, if the petitioner can deposit at least a further sum of Rs.3,00,000/ instead of Rs.7,00,000/-. He may
On 24 July 2026 the order records: 1. The Criminal Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the signed order placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

3 March 2025. 1. The delay of 41 days in filing the present petition is adequately explained and is condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 54808/2025 is allowed.
29 April 2025. On the request of learned counsel for the respondent-State, list next week.
21 May 2025. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e., 23.05.2025. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
23 May 2025. 1. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.03.2025, the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees five lakhs). 2. List the matter after the partial Court working days are over for hearing on the quantum of sentence.
21 July 2025. List in the 2nd week of August, 2025.
11 August 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees five lakhs), as directed by this Court vide order dated 03.03.2025 inasmuch as he wants to compensate the family of the victim instead of undergoing the whole sentence.
16 December 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a position to make a further deposit of Rs.7,00,000/- as directed by the order of this Court on 11.08.2025. 2. He wants to take instructions, if the petitioner can deposit at least a further sum of Rs.3,00,000/ instead of Rs.7,00,000/-. He may
16 January 2026. List on 09.03.2026. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
9 March 2026. Leave granted. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
1 April 2026. List in the month of July, 2026.
24 July 2026. 1. The Criminal Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the signed order placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Mr. Awanish Kumar, Mr. Siddharth Kumar Sharma, Ms. Vijaishree Tiwari, Mr. S.k Pandey, Mr. Chandrashekhar A. Chakalabbi, Mr. Anshul Rai, Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Mr. S.K Pandey, Ms. Garima, Ms. Supriya, Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. D. S. Parmar, Ms. Mrinal Gopal Elker, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh- G.A., Mr. Saurabh Singh, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Ms. Chhavi Khandelwal, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh- G.a., Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Ms. Uikey Ria, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Ms. Silpi, Ms. Abha

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 July 2026 the order records: The Criminal Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the signed order placed on the file.

Subjects

Quashing order Criminal appeals Delay

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 24 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Jul 2026

Final disposition

The Criminal Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the signed order placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 11 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.