JANKI DEVI @ USHA KIRAN Versus RAJ KUMAR SETHI (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES) AND ANR. ITEM] (C.A. 3377/2019)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3377/2019

Case Record

C.A. 3377/2019

JANKI DEVI @ USHA KIRAN Versus RAJ KUMAR SETHI (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES) AND ANR. ITEM]

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

25 PDF renditions· 25 distinct judicial orders· 25 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

JANKI DEVI @ USHA KIRAN Versus RAJ KUMAR SETHI (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES) & ANR.. C.A. 3377/2019 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010045792018. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 25 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 13 April 2018 to 18 May 2026.

On 27 April 2018 the order records: Application for exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice.
On 9 July 2018 the order records: Learned counsel for respondent No.1 is granted two weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if necessary, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
On 4 February 2020 the order records: As per Dasti proof, Respondent Nos. 1(3), 2(1) and 2(2) could not be served. Hence, Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of these respondents within two weeks. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that Respondent Nos.
On 31 July 2020 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner not connected. Application for direction alongwith application for exemption from filing court fee in respect of respondent nos. 1(3), 2(1) and 2(2) and application seeking early disposal in respect of respondent no.1(1) has been filed. Be processed as per rules.
On 4 September 2020 the order records: As per office report, ld. Counsel for the petitioner has to take fresh steps/file application in respect of respondent nos. 1(3), 2(1) and 2(2).
On 25 January 2021 the order records: Issue notice. Learned counsel for the appellant accepts notice.
On 19 April 2024 the order records: IA No.131087/2023 seeking appropriate interim direction has been filed by the respondent no.1(i). We are not inclined to entertain this application. Hence, the same is dismissed.
On 18 May 2026 the order records: IA No. 125640/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 07.12.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA No.125640/2026 stands disposed of accordingly.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

13 April 2018. Delay in refiling is condoned. Registry to proceed further.
27 April 2018. Application for exemption from filing official translation is allowed. Issue notice.
9 July 2018. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 is granted two weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if necessary, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
1 April 2019. Leave granted. Issue fresh notice to all unserved respondents returnable within four weeks.
25 July 2019. Ld. Counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks' file proof of dasti service in respect of respondent Nos. 1.3, 2.1 and 2.2. List again on 27.11.2019.
27 November 2019. Four weeks' time, as last chance is given to the Ld. counsel for the petitioner to file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to respondent Nos. 1(3), 2(1) and 2(2).
4 February 2020. As per Dasti proof, Respondent Nos. 1(3), 2(1) and 2(2) could not be served. Hence, Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of these respondents within two weeks. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that Respondent Nos.
19 June 2020. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps/file application to effect service on respondent nos.1(3), 2(1) and 2(2) within four weeks' time, as last opportunity. List again on 31.7.2020.
31 July 2020. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner not connected. Application for direction alongwith application for exemption from filing court fee in respect of respondent nos. 1(3), 2(1) and 2(2) and application seeking early disposal in respect of respondent no.1(1) has been filed. Be processed as per rules.
4 September 2020. As per office report, ld. Counsel for the petitioner has to take fresh steps/file application in respect of respondent nos. 1(3), 2(1) and 2(2).
29 October 2020. Application for substituted service in respect of respondent Nos.1(3), 2(1) and 2(2) is allowed. Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks two weeks' time to file proof of publication. Granted. List again on 17.11.2020.
18 November 2020. Respondent No.1(1) is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1(2), 1(3), 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3) but none has entered appearance.
25 January 2021. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the appellant accepts notice.
13 July 2023. Respondent no. 1 (i) is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 (ii & iii) and 2 (i & ii) but none has entered appearance.
21 July 2023. List IA No. 131087/2023 on 7.8.2023.
7 August 2023. List on 14.9.2023 for hearing.
15 September 2023. in this I.A./the petitioner in the Civil Appeal seeks time to file objection to the prayers made in the I.A. Permission sought for is granted. The same shall be done within two weeks' time. List on 06.10.2023.
6 October 2023. List on 13.10.2023.
13 October 2023. List on 20.11.2023.
20 November 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for respondent No.1.1 seeking adjournment, the matter stands adjourned for two weeks. List the matter on 08.12.2023.
8 December 2023. List on 13.02.2024.
13 February 2024. List on 18.04.2024.
19 April 2024. IA No.131087/2023 seeking appropriate interim direction has been filed by the respondent no.1(i). We are not inclined to entertain this application. Hence, the same is dismissed.
4 November 2025. List in the second week of December, 2025.
18 May 2026. IA No. 125640/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 07.12.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA No.125640/2026 stands disposed of accordingly.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Vishal Mann, Ms. Ruby, Ms. Smita Maan, Mr. Vishal Manna, Mr. Anand Gautam, Mr. Vishal Maan, Mr. Satyawan Dattu, Mr Vishal Maan, Mr. Kartik Jindal, Mr. Jayant Tewathia, Mr. Aditya Singh, Mr. Dhruv Mehta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. K. N. Rai, Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Nisha Sharma, Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Mr. Ashok Sethi, Mr Rajat Aneja, Ms Vandana Aneja, Ms Chandrika Gupta, Mrs. Vandana Aneja, Mr. Kartik Krishan Sood, Mr. K.N. Rai, Ms. Radhika Gupta

Relief Sought & Granted

On 18 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: IA No. 125640/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 07.12.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA No.125640/2026 stands disposed of accordingly.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 18 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 18 May 2026

Next hearing

18 May 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 25 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.