JAMAL UDDIN MAQSOOD AHMAD AND ANR. Versus SYED GHUFFRAN HUSSAIN AND ORS. ANNEXTURES (ARBIT.PETITION 24/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · ARBIT.PETITION 24/2025

Case Record

ARBIT.PETITION 24/2025

JAMAL UDDIN MAQSOOD AHMAD AND ANR. Versus SYED GHUFFRAN HUSSAIN AND ORS. ANNEXTURES

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA · HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

ARBIT.PETITION Appellate relief Contractual Obligations

5 PDF renditions· 5 distinct judicial orders· 5 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

JAMAL UDDIN MAQSOOD AHMAD & ANR. Versus SYED GHUFFRAN HUSSAIN & ORS.. ARBIT.PETITION 24/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010169362025. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 5 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 23 May 2025 to 17 July 2026.

On 19 January 2026 the order records: 1. It is stated that the counter affidavit has been filed way back in July, 2025 and the pleadings are complete. 2. It seems that the counter affidavit is not tagged with the paper-book.
On 20 March 2026 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that unfortunately the petitioner no.2 has passed away on 06.03.2026. He seeks and is granted four weeks' time to bring on record the legal representatives of petitioner no.2. 2. Post the matter on 29.05.2026.
On 17 July 2026 the order records: IA No.112754/2026 is allowed. The arbitration petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

23 May 2025. 1. Issue notice, returnable on 29.07.2025. 2. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
19 January 2026. 1. It is stated that the counter affidavit has been filed way back in July, 2025 and the pleadings are complete. 2. It seems that the counter affidavit is not tagged with the paper-book.
20 March 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that unfortunately the petitioner no.2 has passed away on 06.03.2026. He seeks and is granted four weeks' time to bring on record the legal representatives of petitioner no.2. 2. Post the matter on 29.05.2026.
29 May 2026. List on 17.07.2026.
17 July 2026. IA No.112754/2026 is allowed. The arbitration petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Mr. Bhushan, Mr. Mayank Gupta, Mr. Nishant Thakur, Mr. S.K. Sarkar, Mr. Swayamprabh, Mr. S.k. Sarkar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, Mr. Rakesh Bhugra, Mr. Niyazuddin, Mr. Mohammad Mazhar Ahmed, Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq, Ms. Sabika Ahmed, Ms. Shagufta Ansari, Mr. Rahul Yadav

Relief Sought & Granted

On 17 July 2026 the order records: The arbitration petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.

Subjects

Appellate relief Contractual Obligations

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 17 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 17 Jul 2026

Final disposition

The arbitration petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.

Important procedural note

Written only from 5 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.