JAMAL MOHAMMED AND ORS. Versus THE ESTATE OFFICER, TAMIL NADU WAKF BOARD AND ANR. HARISH KUMAR [R-2] (C.A. 3490/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3490/2025

Case Record

C.A. 3490/2025

JAMAL MOHAMMED AND ORS. Versus THE ESTATE OFFICER, TAMIL NADU WAKF BOARD AND ANR. HARISH KUMAR [R-2]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

9 PDF renditions· 9 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

JAMAL MOHAMMED & ORS. Versus THE ESTATE OFFICER, TAMIL NADU WAKF BOARD & ANR.. C.A. 3490/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010042932023. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 27 February 2023 to 21 August 2026.

On 27 February 2023 the order records: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to bring on record the Lease Deed dated 03.07.2011 and Sale Deed dated 08.02.2012. To enable him to do so, list the matter after three weeks.
On 27 March 2023 the order records: Issue notice to the respondents. In the meanwhile, the status quo existing as on today, be continued.
On 12 May 2023 the order records: Letter has been circulated learned counsel for the petitioner seeking an adjournment. Mr. G. Balaji, Advocate on Record seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.1.
On 10 July 2023 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for respondent no.1 seeking adjournment for filing counter affidavit, list the matter on 14 th July, 2023 (Friday).
On 14 July 2023 the order records: Though, the learned counsel for the respondents contended that the issue herein, is similar to SLP(C) No. 4574/2023 which arises from the common order and had been dismissed, we are of the opinion that the instant petition requires a separate consideration as the High Court had also taken note of the fact separately. I
On 25 February 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted.
On 21 August 2026 the order records: 1. Member Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Chennai1 has forwarded to this Court a signed settlement format executed by the parties on 29th July, 2026 together with an undated letter signed by the appellants in the 1 DLSA presence of two witnesses. 2. Appellants 1 and 3, who are reportedly siblings, have jo

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

27 February 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to bring on record the Lease Deed dated 03.07.2011 and Sale Deed dated 08.02.2012. To enable him to do so, list the matter after three weeks.
22 March 2023. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e.27.03.2023.
27 March 2023. Issue notice to the respondents. In the meanwhile, the status quo existing as on today, be continued.
1 May 2023. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e.12.05.2023.
12 May 2023. Letter has been circulated learned counsel for the petitioner seeking an adjournment. Mr. G. Balaji, Advocate on Record seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.1.
10 July 2023. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for respondent no.1 seeking adjournment for filing counter affidavit, list the matter on 14 th July, 2023 (Friday).
14 July 2023. Though, the learned counsel for the respondents contended that the issue herein, is similar to SLP(C) No. 4574/2023 which arises from the common order and had been dismissed, we are of the opinion that the instant petition requires a separate consideration as the High Court had also taken note of the fact separately. I
25 February 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted.
21 August 2026. 1. Member Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Chennai1 has forwarded to this Court a signed settlement format executed by the parties on 29th July, 2026 together with an undated letter signed by the appellants in the 1 DLSA presence of two witnesses. 2. Appellants 1 and 3, who are reportedly siblings, have jo
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr Rahul Jain, Mr. Mohit Kumar, Ms. Subasri Jaganathan, Mr. Rahul Jain, Mr. Sanjay, Mr. R. Sharath, Mrs. Smitakshi Talukdar, Ms. Samitakshi Talukdar, Mr. R.Sharath, Mr. Sanjay Hegde, Mr. Shahrukh Ali, Mr. Ankit Tiwari Advocates — Respondents: Mr. P.R. Kovilan Poongundran, Mr. T. Harish Kumar, Mr. Subham Kothari, Mr. Muthuvel Palani, Mr. G. Balaji, Ms. R. Shase, Mr. Navneet Dugar, Ms. Astha Tyagi, Mr. V. Balaji, Mr. C. Kannan, Mr. Nizamuddin, Mr. B. Dhananjay

Relief Sought & Granted

On 21 August 2026 the order records: In such view of the matter, the civil appeal stands disposed of recording that the terms of settlement, which shall form part of the award, have been fully worked out.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 21 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 21 Aug 2026

Final disposition

In such view of the matter, the civil appeal stands disposed of recording that the terms of settlement, which shall form part of the award, have been fully worked out.

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.