JAI SINGH AND ORS. IV [P-4.1], [P-4.2], [P-5] Versus STATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. (C.A. 1778/2019)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 1778/2019

Case Record

C.A. 1778/2019

JAI SINGH AND ORS. IV [P-4.1], [P-4.2], [P-5] Versus STATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS.

MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

55 PDF renditions· 55 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

JAI SINGH & ORS. Versus STATE OF HARYANA . & ORS.. C.A. 1778/2019 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010313382012. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 26 October 2017 to 23 July 2026.

On 26 October 2017 the order records: Fresh notice for alternative arrangement be issued to respondent No.3. List again on 13.12.2017.
On 19 February 2018 the order records: Fresh notice for alternative arrangement be issued to respondent No.3. Order dated 1.4.2016 indicates that last and final opportunity was granted to respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 6 for Item No.36 -2 filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Around two years have elapsed, till date as per record neither vakalatnama nor cou
On 16 April 2018 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.3 in terms of Government O.M. No.F.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 13.7.2018.
On 9 January 2019 the order records: Opportunity to respondent nos. 1,2 and 4 to 6 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Item No.8 Respondent no.3 has refused to accept the notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete but none has entered appearance.
On 20 March 2026 the order records: As per office report, Ld. Counsel for the appellant has expired. Hence, notice for alternative arrangement was issued to all the appellants. Appellant Nos.4.1, 4.2, 5, 9, 10, 14, 16.1 to 16.4, 19 to 24 are duly represented.
On 24 April 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service already deemed complete on respondent no. 3 on 09.01.2019, but none has entered appearance so far.
On 19 May 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no. 3 but none has entered appearance.
On 23 July 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no. 3 but none has entered appearance.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

26 October 2017. Fresh notice for alternative arrangement be issued to respondent No.3. List again on 13.12.2017.
13 December 2017. Complete category matter. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent No.3 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.
19 February 2018. Fresh notice for alternative arrangement be issued to respondent No.3. Order dated 1.4.2016 indicates that last and final opportunity was granted to respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 6 for Item No.36 -2 filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Around two years have elapsed, till date as per record neither vakalatnama nor cou
16 April 2018. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.3 in terms of Government O.M. No.F.12(77)/10-Judl. dt.18.8.2011 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 13.7.2018.
13 July 2018. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.3 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 31.8.2018.
4 September 2018. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars to effect service on respondent no.3 within two weeks time, spare copy available. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 30.10.2018.
30 October 2018. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh particulars to effect service on respondent no.3 within two weeks time as last opportunity, spare copy available. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 9.1.2019.
9 January 2019. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1,2 and 4 to 6 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Item No.8 Respondent no.3 has refused to accept the notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete but none has entered appearance.
18 February 2019. Leave granted in both the special leave petitions. Hearing expedited considering that the matters of the year 2013.
20 March 2026. As per office report, Ld. Counsel for the appellant has expired. Hence, notice for alternative arrangement was issued to all the appellants. Appellant Nos.4.1, 4.2, 5, 9, 10, 14, 16.1 to 16.4, 19 to 24 are duly represented.
24 April 2026. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service already deemed complete on respondent no. 3 on 09.01.2019, but none has entered appearance so far.
19 May 2026. Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no. 3 but none has entered appearance.
23 July 2026. Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no. 3 but none has entered appearance.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prasenjit Keswani, Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Mr. V. D. Khanna, Mr. Deepak Jain, Mr. Vishnu Shanker, Ms. A. Sumathi, Mrs. V. D. Khanna, Ms. Prabhleen Kaur, Mr. Devender Kumar, Mr Prasenjit Keswani, Mr Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Ms Devika Khanna Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Ms. Anubha Agrawal, Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Mr. Devendra Singh, Mr. Rajat Sharma, Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, Mr. Dinesh Verma, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohtagi, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Mr. Dinesh Vema, Ms. Sasmita Tripathy, Mr. Suraj P. Ahlawat

Relief Sought & Granted

On 23 July 2026 the latest order on this record says: Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no. 3 but none has entered appearance.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Jul 2026

Next hearing

20 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 19 other files in the folder were left out.