- 4 September 2023. A letter has been circulated by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty. List on 3rd October, 2023.
- 3 October 2023. Delay condoned. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
- 20 November 2023. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellant seeking adjournment on the ground of filing of an affidavit in compliance of order dated 3.10.2023, list on (JATINDER KAUR) (AVGV RAMU) P.S. to REGISTRAR
- 16 January 2024. We are not satisfied with the affidavit of compliance filed by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council pursuant to the order dated 3rd October, 2023. The basic facts such as average daily generation of solid waste in the municipal limits have not been set out. Even the capacity of MSW referred to in paragraph 4.1 ha
- 7 March 2024. Today, the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board is represented by an Advocate. The learned counsel for the appellant-Council will provide copies of the affidavits filed by the Chief Officer of the appellant-Council to the learned counsel appearing for the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. The concerned Officers of th
- 3 May 2024. Perused the affidavit filed by Sub-Regional Officer of the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. We direct the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board to verify whether the sites of proposed SITs mentioned in Clause (iv) of page 2 of the said affidavit are suitable in all respects for the construction of STPs.
- 15 July 2024. Learned counsel appearing for Maharashtra Pollution Control Board states that affidavit in terms of earlier order dated 3rd May, 2024 has been filed today. Learned counsel to furnish copies thereof to all concerned advocates. List on 5th August, 2024 to consider the affidavit.
- 5 August 2024. We have perused the affidavit dated 10 th July, 2024 of the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. We direct the appellant to file an affidavit of its chief officer indicating the timelines for setting up the Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) on the site approved by the State. We grant time of three weeks to do so.
- 2 September 2024. We have perused the affidavit of the Chief Officer dated 31 st August, 2024 filed in terms of the order dated 5th August, 2024. We have perused the averments made in paragraph 17 of the affidavit.
- 9 December 2024. We find from the status report that now the Chief Officer, Islampur Municipal Council has coming out with an excuse of non cooperation by the National Highway Authority of India. We, therefore, direct the Chief Officer, Islampur Municipal Council to remain present before the Court through video conference on the next d
- 8 January 2025. Pursuant to this Court's order dated 9 th December, 2024, the Chief Officer, Islampur Municipal Council has joined through video conference. In the presence of the Chief Officer, the learned senior counsel representing the appellant-Islampur Municipal Council states that now the issue with the National Highway Authorit
- 24 February 2025. Only by way of indulgence, we grant time to the Chief Officer of the Islampur Municipal Council to file an affidavit in terms of the order dated 8th January, 2025 till 17th March, 2025. No further time shall be granted. List the Appeal on 21st March, 2025.
- 21 March 2025. Perused the affidavit dated 17 th March, 2025 of the Chief Officer of the appellant-Islampur Municipal Council. In view of what is stated in paragraph 14, it will be appropriate if the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran decides the proposals (revised Detailed Project Reports) submitted by the appellant at the earliest and
- 9 May 2025. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that consideration of revised Detailed Project Report by Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran is at penultimate stage. Only by way of indulgence, we extend the time granted earlier to the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran by a period of four weeks from today. No further ext
- 1 August 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that technical sanction has been granted by Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran and that he would be filing the status report in this regard indicating further steps that are required to be taken in accordance with the affidavit filed in this regard earlier. 2. List in the month
- 8 September 2025. In view of the letter circulated on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant, list after two weeks.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. A. Karthik, Mr. Arsh Khan, Ms. Sreepriya, Mr. Govind Manoharan, Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, Mr. Anchit Singla, Mr. Nishchaiy Sharma, Mr. Sudhanshu Choudhuri, Ms. Smrithi Suresh, Mr. B.D. Rao Kundan, Mr. Bd Rao Kundan, Mr. B. Rao Kundan Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Arvind S. Avhad, Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Mr. Bharat Bagla, Mr. Sourav Singh, Mr. Aditya Krishna, Ms. Raavi Sharma, Dr. Arvind S. Avhad, Mr. Abhishek Krishna, Mr. Sushil Sonkar, Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh
