- 15 September 2025. 1. The case of the learned Counsel for the appellant is that there is no dispute that at the stage of passing an order under Section 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), an opportunity of hearing is to be afforded to the affected party. Therefore, the appellant had a right to be heard. It is the case
- 30 October 2025. 1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for opportunity and is allowed three weeks' time to file rejoinder affidavit. 2. List this matter on 03.12.2025.
- 3 December 2025. 1. List on 17.12.2025. 2. Interim order granted earlier to continue.
- 17 December 2025. 1. List on 28.01.2026.
- 28 January 2026. List tomorrow i.e. 29.01.2026.
- 29 January 2026. 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Shyam Divan, Mr. Joshua Samuel, Mr. Sahil Tagotra, Mr. Arpith Jacob Varaprasad, Ms. Shreya Kasera, Mr. Arpith Jacob, Mr Shyam Divan, Mr Joshua Samuel, Mr Arpith Jacob, Ms Shreya Kasera, Mr Iqbal Jumabhoy, Mr Rahul Kaushik Advocates — Respondents: Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Mr. Prashant Kumar, Ms. Nikita Menon, Mr. Amrit Bhatia, Ms. Palak Arora, Ms. Mallika Kamal, Mr. Samar Singh, Mr Sumit Sinha, Mr. Sumit Sinha, Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Ms. Aachal Sah, Mr. Sidhant Ahirwal
