- 17 February 2026. 1. Mr. Rachit Mittal, learned counsel for the appellant drawing attention to page 24 (Pdf 36) of the impugned order (last seven lines) submits that even the NCLAT duly recognized that the debt was acknowledged in the balance sheet of the corporate debtor. The only aspect on which the appellant has been non suited is th
- 20 July 2026. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants in these matters seek two weeks' time to file rejoinder affidavit. 2. Let the needful be done within two weeks.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rachit Mittal, Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Parish Mishra, Mr. Shubham Sonthalia, Mr. Kanishk Raj, Ms. Srishti Agarwaal, Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Mr. Shivansh Bansal, Mr. Anup Kumar, Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Ms. Akanksha Rathore, Mr. Vyom Raghuvanshi Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Mr. Vyom Raghuvanshi, Ms. Akanksha Rathore, Mr. Rachit Mittal, Mr. Parish Mishra, Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Kanishk Raj, Ms. Srishti Agrawaal, Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Ms. Aayushi Kiran
