- 11 May 2018. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 3 July 2019. Issue notice. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on caveat accepts notice.
- 19 August 2019. INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.97524, 97552, 97530, 97582, 97576, 97489, 97492, 97522, 97579, 97556, 98318, 97501, 97543, 98321, 97569, 97550, 97535, 97504, 97586,97495, 97527, 97470, 97523, 97525, 97479, 97520, 97497, 97526, 97490, 97513 & 97555 of 2018 (Applications for Direction) The applications are disposed of in t
- 12 September 2019. CA. NOS. 5190, 5129, 5128,5199, 5197, 5196, 5195, 5194, 5204, 5215, 5214, 5213, 5749, 5748, 3275 OF 2018 Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the parties have not filed ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV any statement of case within the prescribed period. Registry is directed to process the matter for being listed
- 21 October 2019. The amounts have been deposited and the office report wants to obtain instructions whether the said amount should be kept in FDR. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) states that the amount may be released to them subject to security for restitution.
- 29 July 2020. Perused the office report. The amount now deposited be also kept in an FDR initially for a period of one year to be kept renewed til further orders. Similarly, the amount already deposited should also be kept similarly in an FDR to be kept renewed until further directions.
- 26 July 2021. OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS The amount be deposited in the FDR in terms of order passed earlier and as proposed by the Registry. Ordered accordingly.
- 29 June 2022. We have perused the office report dated 24th June, Registry is directed to invest the pending amount as per the guidelines formulated by Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India in appropriate scheme offering higher rate of interest for a period of one year and shall be renewed from time to time until further orders. Office
- 18 July 2023. The matters have been put on office report that the amount may be deposited in an interest bearing fixed deposit for a period of one year to be kept renewed. In order to obviate the necessity of listing of the matters again and again on this aspect, we direct that whenever the amounts are so deposited by the petitioner
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Mr. Shashank Tripathi, Mr. Shyam Diwan, Ms. Apeksha Deshmukh, Mr. Rohit Prasad, Ms. Astha Sharma, Ms. Mantika Haryani Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Rakesh Kumar-I, Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Mr. Anupam Sharma, Mr. Shishir Raj, Mr. Lakhan Singh, Ms. Anubha Singh, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, Mr. Rakesh Kumar-i, Mr. Anil Kr. Sahu, Mr. Ritesh Kumar Jaiswal, Mr. M. Nayana Gautam
