INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. Versus M/S. MODERN SERVICE STATION YAMUNAPAR AFFIDAVIT DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES (C.A. 11002/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 11002/2024

Case Record

C.A. 11002/2024

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. Versus M/S. MODERN SERVICE STATION YAMUNAPAR AFFIDAVIT DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

C.A.Direction to public body Civil appeals Municipal law

7 PDF renditions· 7 distinct judicial orders· 7 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. Versus M/S. MODERN SERVICE STATION YAMUNAPAR. C.A. 11002/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010181792024. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 7 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 26 July 2024 to 13 October 2025.

On 26 July 2024 the order records: Issue notice, returnable on 27.08.2024. Learned senior counsel appears on caveat for the respondent and accepts notice through his learned advocate-on-record.
On 3 September 2024 the order records: As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondent two weeks' time and the same is granted. List on 30.09.2024.
On 1 May 2025 the order records: IA No.101960/2025 in Civil Appeal No(s). 11002/2024 Not to be deleted from the list of 02.05.2025.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

26 July 2024. Issue notice, returnable on 27.08.2024. Learned senior counsel appears on caveat for the respondent and accepts notice through his learned advocate-on-record.
27 August 2024. The matter be listed on 3rd September, 2024.
3 September 2024. As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondent two weeks' time and the same is granted. List on 30.09.2024.
30 September 2024. Leave granted. List on 11.12.2024.
1 May 2025. IA No.101960/2025 in Civil Appeal No(s). 11002/2024 Not to be deleted from the list of 02.05.2025.
2 May 2025. IA No. 101960/2025 is allowed. List on 29.07.2025.
13 October 2025. No orders.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Mrs. Priya Puri, Ms. Pinki Aggarwal, Mr. Sharad Kumar Puri, Ms. Parul Sharma, Mrs. Madhavi Diwan, Mr. Vibhav Srivastava, Mrs. Pinki Aggarwal, Mr. Sachin Dubey, Ms. Aishani Narain, Ms. Ritim Mangla Advocates — Respondents: Dr. S. Muralidhar, Mr. Avi Tandon, Mrs. Shreya Gupta, Ms. Meghna Tandon, Mr. Anish Agarwal, Mrs. Vanshika Gupta, Ms. Pallak Bhagat, Mr. Srinivas Vishven, Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Mrgina Shekhar, Mr. Kavin Gulati, Mr. Ami Tandon

Relief Sought & Granted

On 13 October 2025 the latest order on this record says: No orders.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Direction to public body Civil appeals Municipal law

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 13 Oct 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 13 Oct 2025

Next hearing

4 Nov 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 7 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.