INDIAN ASTHMA CARE SOCIETY AND ORS. (CONMT.PET.(C) 37/2012)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · CONMT.PET.(C) 37/2012

Case Record

CONMT.PET.(C) 37/2012

INDIAN ASTHMA CARE SOCIETY AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

CONMT.PET.(C)Writs Civil Contempt Revision Service matters

319 PDF renditions· 319 distinct judicial orders· 31 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

CENTRAL ARECANUT MARKETING COPN.& ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA. CONMT.PET.(C) 37/2012 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010023072012. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 31 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 23 February 2012 to 23 September 2016.

On 23 February 2012 the order records: These matters be listed for consideration after hearing in S.L.P.(C) No.15436 of 2009 along with connected cases and T.P.(Crl.) Nos.383-385 along with T.P.(Crl.) Nos.462-464 of 2011 and Writ Petition(Crl.) No. D16039 of 2011 and Writ Petition(Crl.) No. 146 of 2011 and S.L.P. (Crl.) No.1105 of 2012 is concluded.
On 12 December 2012 the order records: Arguments in some of these cases were heard in 2011 and again in When the cases were listed for further hearing on 23.2.2012 the Court was already busy in other part-heard matters. Therefore, a direction was issued that these cases will be taken up after conclusion of hearing of other matters. However, the Registry mis
On 3 April 2013 the order records: Contempt Petition (C) No.237 of 2011 in SLP(C)No.16308 of 2007 In view of the affidavit filed on behalf of the non petitioners, the notice is discharged and the contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. __________________________________________________________________ At the commencement of further arguments, Shri
On 3 May 2013 the order records: Perused office report dated 2.5.2013. The affidavits have been filed by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Manipur Pollution Control Board in compliance of the directions given by the Court on 3.4.2013.
On 24 October 2013 the order records: During the pendency of S.L.P.(C) No.16308 of 2007 Ankur Gutka v. Indian Asthama Care Society and others and three connected matters, a number of writ petitions were filed which were heard with the special leave petitions.
On 31 October 2013 the order records: At the threshold of further hearing of the matters, Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C)No.289 of 2011 made a request that he may be allowed to address the Court. As requested by Shri Dwivedi, we took up WP(C)No.289 of 2011.
On 7 September 2016 the order records: In the first category of cases, heard the arguments of Mr. Subramanium Prasad, Mr. V. Shekhar and Mr. Pinaki Mishra, learned senior counsel for the respective parties. They have concluded their submissions. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations framed thereunder,
On 23 September 2016 the order records: These matters have been heard inter alia on 1.9.2016, 7.9.2016, 15.9.2016, 16.9.2016, 20.9.2016 and 21.9.2016. In the course of submissions by the learned counsel, it has been stated today that longer time will be required in completing the hearing as more submissions are to be made by many learned counsel representing

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

23 February 2012. These matters be listed for consideration after hearing in S.L.P.(C) No.15436 of 2009 along with connected cases and T.P.(Crl.) Nos.383-385 along with T.P.(Crl.) Nos.462-464 of 2011 and Writ Petition(Crl.) No. D16039 of 2011 and Writ Petition(Crl.) No. 146 of 2011 and S.L.P. (Crl.) No.1105 of 2012 is concluded.
12 December 2012. Arguments in some of these cases were heard in 2011 and again in When the cases were listed for further hearing on 23.2.2012 the Court was already busy in other part-heard matters. Therefore, a direction was issued that these cases will be taken up after conclusion of hearing of other matters. However, the Registry mis
14 February 2013. List these cases on 02.04.2013.
2 April 2013. Shri Sudhir Chandra, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in Writ Petition (Civil) No.354 of 2011 made and concluded his submissions. Shri Ashok Bhasin, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in Writ Petition(Civil) No.131 of 2011 and Shri D.N. Goburdhan, learned counsel for the petitioners
3 April 2013. Contempt Petition (C) No.237 of 2011 in SLP(C)No.16308 of 2007 In view of the affidavit filed on behalf of the non petitioners, the notice is discharged and the contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. __________________________________________________________________ At the commencement of further arguments, Shri
3 May 2013. Perused office report dated 2.5.2013. The affidavits have been filed by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Manipur Pollution Control Board in compliance of the directions given by the Court on 3.4.2013.
27 September 2013. List the case on 1.10.2013. To be taken up as the first case.
1 October 2013. Shri Prashant Bhushan and Shri R.S. Suri, made submissions on behalf of Health for Millions and Doctors for You. Both of them had filed intervention pursuant to the orders passed in the writ petitions filed by them. They relied upon the provisions contained in the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the Food Safety
4 October 2013. Further arguments of Ms. Indira Jaising, learned Additional Solicitor General heard. For completion of arguments, the case is adjourned to To be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
4 October 2013. Further arguments of Ms. Indira Jaising, learned Additional Solicitor General heard. For completion of arguments, the case is adjourned to To be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
7 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 21.10.2013. To be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
21 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 22.10.2013. To be taken up at 10.30 a.m.
21 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 22.10.2013. To be taken up at 10.30 a.m.
21 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 22.10.2013. To be taken up at 10.30 a.m.
22 October 2013. Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned amicus, made his submissions, which remained inconclusive. For further arguments, list theses cases on 23.10.2013.
23 October 2013. Shri Gopal Subramanium, learned amicus, completed his submissions. Shri Vishnu Behari Tewari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Indian Dental Association also made his submissions.
24 October 2013. During the pendency of S.L.P.(C) No.16308 of 2007 Ankur Gutka v. Indian Asthama Care Society and others and three connected matters, a number of writ petitions were filed which were heard with the special leave petitions.
31 October 2013. At the threshold of further hearing of the matters, Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C)No.289 of 2011 made a request that he may be allowed to address the Court. As requested by Shri Dwivedi, we took up WP(C)No.289 of 2011.
13 November 2013. List these cases on 18.11.2013. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
18 November 2013. Not taken up.
25 November 2013. On a mention made by learned senior counsel for the parties, we direct that these petitions be listed on 29.11.2013. To be taken up along with W.P.(C)No.856 of 2013.
29 November 2013. Interlocutory Application Nos. 2, 3 and 4 in Writ Petition (C) No. 289 of 2011 are allowed and leave is granted to the petitioner to amend the memo of parties. Notice be issued to the impleaded parties.
18 July 2016. List on 03.08.2016.
4 August 2016. Upon being mentioned by Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel stating that they have received a communication from the Office of Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned Amicus Curiae thereby requesting for an adjounrment on the ground that he is unwell. As prayed, the matters are adjourned by three weeks.
1 September 2016. Heard the arguments of Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in S.L.P.(C) No. 16314/2007 and Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 354/2011 and T.C.(C) No. 95/2012. Also heard the arguments of Mr. Subramanium Prasad, learned senior coun
7 September 2016. In the first category of cases, heard the arguments of Mr. Subramanium Prasad, Mr. V. Shekhar and Mr. Pinaki Mishra, learned senior counsel for the respective parties. They have concluded their submissions. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations framed thereunder,
15 September 2016. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations, heard the arguments of Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Mr. P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard the arguments of Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, in part. List for further hea
16 September 2016. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations framed thereunder, challenging prohibitory orders in the transferred cases, heard the arguments of Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned senior counsel (amicus curiae) in part. List for further hearing on 20.09.2016 as part heard (1
20 September 2016. Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner in T.C (C) No. 7/2016 resumed his arguments at 10.40 a.m. and was on his legs when the Court rose for the day. List tomorrow as part heard (fist case).
21 September 2016. Heard the further submissions of Mr. C. S. Vaidyanathan & Dr. A. M. Singhvi , learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners. List the matters on Friday i.e. 23.09.2016 at 11:30 A.M.
The record also contains 1 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. P.B. Suresh, Mr. Abhishek Swarop, Mr. K.C.Dua, Mr. Arun K.Sinha, Ms. Aparna Jha, Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Mr. Jay Kishore Singh, Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Mr. Santosh Kr. Sethi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Ms. A. Sumathi, Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Ms. Aparna Jha, Ms. Shally Bhasin Maheshwari, Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Mr. Shiv Prakash Pandey

Relief Sought & Granted

On 15 September 2016 the order records: ] : Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the transfer petition. Permission sought for is granted. The transfer petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Writs Civil Contempt Revision Service matters

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2016

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2016

Next hearing

7 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 31 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 217 other files in the folder were left out.